Elite support for peace agreements: evidence from Colombia

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Asbel Bohigues, J. Rivas, S. García
{"title":"Elite support for peace agreements: evidence from Colombia","authors":"Asbel Bohigues, J. Rivas, S. García","doi":"10.1080/21647259.2021.1956751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 2016, Colombians in a plebiscite rejected the Peace Agreement between the government and FARC, although a new version was approved by Congress later that year. Attention has been paid to this plebiscite and public opinion, but little empirical evidence has been offered on the attitudes of the Colombian political elites who ultimately approved the Agreement. Drawing on elite surveys made before (2014) and after (2018) the Agreement, this is the first article to address legislators’ support for political participation of former guerrilla, and reductions of their sentences and penalties. Results show that pro-military and right-leaning legislators were less supportive of political participation, while female and lower-income legislators were less supportive of reductions in sentences. However, between 2014 and 2018 the effect of political attitudes loses strength, as opposed to sociodemographics. We argue that this was due to mixed signals sent by the new government regarding implementation of the Agreement.","PeriodicalId":45555,"journal":{"name":"Peacebuilding","volume":"10 1","pages":"66 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21647259.2021.1956751","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peacebuilding","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2021.1956751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In 2016, Colombians in a plebiscite rejected the Peace Agreement between the government and FARC, although a new version was approved by Congress later that year. Attention has been paid to this plebiscite and public opinion, but little empirical evidence has been offered on the attitudes of the Colombian political elites who ultimately approved the Agreement. Drawing on elite surveys made before (2014) and after (2018) the Agreement, this is the first article to address legislators’ support for political participation of former guerrilla, and reductions of their sentences and penalties. Results show that pro-military and right-leaning legislators were less supportive of political participation, while female and lower-income legislators were less supportive of reductions in sentences. However, between 2014 and 2018 the effect of political attitudes loses strength, as opposed to sociodemographics. We argue that this was due to mixed signals sent by the new government regarding implementation of the Agreement.
精英支持和平协议:来自哥伦比亚的证据
摘要2016年,哥伦比亚人在公民投票中否决了政府与哥伦比亚革命武装力量之间的《和平协议》,尽管新版本在当年晚些时候获得了国会的批准。人们对这次公民投票和公众舆论给予了关注,但对最终批准《协定》的哥伦比亚政治精英的态度几乎没有提供实证证据。根据《协议》之前(2014年)和之后(2018年)进行的精英调查,这是第一篇涉及立法者支持前游击队政治参与以及减刑和处罚的文章。结果显示,亲军事和右倾的立法者不太支持政治参与,而女性和低收入的立法者则不太支持减刑。然而,在2014年至2018年间,与社会人口统计相比,政治态度的影响减弱了。我们认为,这是由于新政府在执行《协定》方面发出了混杂的信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Peacebuilding
Peacebuilding Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信