Leadership and Learning at Work: A Systematic Literature Review of Learning-oriented Leadership

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Daniel Lundqvist, Andreas Wallo, Alan Coetzer, Henrik Kock
{"title":"Leadership and Learning at Work: A Systematic Literature Review of Learning-oriented Leadership","authors":"Daniel Lundqvist, Andreas Wallo, Alan Coetzer, Henrik Kock","doi":"10.1177/15480518221133970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary organizations must be adaptive and agile as the environment changes. To respond to change, leaders must find ways of integrating learning into everyday work experiences. This invites the question: how do leaders facilitate individual, group and organizational learning? Several studies have examined relationships among leadership and learning and potential mediating and moderating variables. However, because this literature is extensive and fragmented it is difficult to discern what is known about how leadership contributes to individual, group and organizational learning. Accordingly, there is a pressing need to assemble and evaluate the existing studies. To address this limitation of the literature, this paper presents a systematic review and critique of literature in this field. Our review of 105 studies suggests that there are statistically significant relationships between different types of leadership and learning at the individual, group, and organizational levels. Furthermore, the findings indicate that these relationships are often mediated by other variables. However, little is known about moderators and boundary conditions. Based on the findings, it would be premature to say with certainty that leadership causally influences learning, since the empirical basis for such a claim is lacking. We outline the conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and empirical refinements needed to guide future research on learning-oriented leadership and advance this research trajectory. The findings of our review and our conclusions will be informative for researchers and practitioners.","PeriodicalId":51455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"205 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518221133970","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Contemporary organizations must be adaptive and agile as the environment changes. To respond to change, leaders must find ways of integrating learning into everyday work experiences. This invites the question: how do leaders facilitate individual, group and organizational learning? Several studies have examined relationships among leadership and learning and potential mediating and moderating variables. However, because this literature is extensive and fragmented it is difficult to discern what is known about how leadership contributes to individual, group and organizational learning. Accordingly, there is a pressing need to assemble and evaluate the existing studies. To address this limitation of the literature, this paper presents a systematic review and critique of literature in this field. Our review of 105 studies suggests that there are statistically significant relationships between different types of leadership and learning at the individual, group, and organizational levels. Furthermore, the findings indicate that these relationships are often mediated by other variables. However, little is known about moderators and boundary conditions. Based on the findings, it would be premature to say with certainty that leadership causally influences learning, since the empirical basis for such a claim is lacking. We outline the conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and empirical refinements needed to guide future research on learning-oriented leadership and advance this research trajectory. The findings of our review and our conclusions will be informative for researchers and practitioners.
领导与工作中的学习:学习型领导的系统文献综述
随着环境的变化,现代组织必须具有适应性和灵活性。为了应对变化,领导者必须找到将学习融入日常工作体验的方法。这就引出了一个问题:领导者如何促进个人、团体和组织的学习?几项研究考察了领导力和学习之间的关系,以及潜在的中介和调节变量。然而,由于这些文献内容广泛且零散,很难辨别领导力对个人、团队和组织学习的贡献。因此,迫切需要对现有研究进行汇编和评估。为了解决文学的这种局限性,本文对这一领域的文学进行了系统的回顾和批判。我们对105项研究的回顾表明,在个人、团队和组织层面,不同类型的领导与学习之间存在统计学上显著的关系。此外,研究结果表明,这些关系往往是由其他变量介导的。然而,对调节因子和边界条件知之甚少。根据这些发现,现在肯定地说领导力会对学习产生因果影响还为时过早,因为这种说法缺乏实证基础。我们概述了指导未来学习型领导研究和推进这一研究轨迹所需的概念、理论、方法和实证改进。我们的综述和结论将为研究人员和从业者提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信