Super Shears: Micro Cases to Reduce Confirmation Bias in Evaluating Management Estimates

IF 0.8 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
C. Sargent, Carol C. Bishop
{"title":"Super Shears: Micro Cases to Reduce Confirmation Bias in Evaluating Management Estimates","authors":"C. Sargent, Carol C. Bishop","doi":"10.2308/CIIA-52222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This two-case set offers evidence of the need for and effectiveness of practice in evaluating evidence and auditing management estimates using both students and audit professionals. Participants must identify and evaluate confirming and disconfirming evidence for management's accrual for allowance for uncollectible accounts and warranty reserves. After practice and feedback in the first case, the second set offers added practice and measures skill improvement. The cases specifically target the perennial problem of “confirmation bias.” Responses from 51 auditing students and 53 auditors (from staff to partner) indicate these tasks are effective, realistic, and motivating.","PeriodicalId":44019,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Auditing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2308/CIIA-52222","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Auditing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/CIIA-52222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This two-case set offers evidence of the need for and effectiveness of practice in evaluating evidence and auditing management estimates using both students and audit professionals. Participants must identify and evaluate confirming and disconfirming evidence for management's accrual for allowance for uncollectible accounts and warranty reserves. After practice and feedback in the first case, the second set offers added practice and measures skill improvement. The cases specifically target the perennial problem of “confirmation bias.” Responses from 51 auditing students and 53 auditors (from staff to partner) indicate these tasks are effective, realistic, and motivating.
超级剪刀:减少管理评估确认偏差的微观案例
这两个案例集为使用学生和审计专业人员评估证据和审计管理估计的实践的必要性和有效性提供了证据。参与者必须识别和评估管理层计提坏账准备金和保修准备金的确认和不确认证据。在第一种情况下的练习和反馈之后,第二组提供了额外的练习并衡量技能的提高。这些案例专门针对“确认偏见”这一长期存在的问题。来自51名审计专业学生和53名审计师(从员工到合作伙伴)的回复表明,这些任务是有效的、现实的和激励性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Issues in Auditing
Current Issues in Auditing BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信