The marketization of educational resources and individual choice: Examining the heterogeneous treatment effect of private tutoring in middle schools

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
社会 Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1177/2057150X231169449
Angran Li
{"title":"The marketization of educational resources and individual choice: Examining the heterogeneous treatment effect of private tutoring in middle schools","authors":"Angran Li","doi":"10.1177/2057150X231169449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, with the rapid marketization of educational resources in K–12 education, private tutoring has become extremely popular in China, yet the previous research has not yet reached a consensus on the impact of private tutoring on academic outcomes, and has also overlooked the influence of individual choice under the exam-oriented educational system in China. By using data drawn from the China Education Panel Survey, this study examines the heterogeneous treatment effect of private tutoring on 8th graders’ academic performance from the perspective of individual choice. The results show that a propensity to attend private tutoring can differentiate the class disparities among middle school students in terms of individual, family, school, and other factors. Furthermore, the results indicate that private tutoring generally has limited impacts on academic achievement, net of all background factors. However, students whose propensity to attend private tutoring lies in the intermediate range tend to benefit the most from private tutoring. For both students from socioeconomically disadvantaged families with a low propensity and their advantaged counterparts with a high propensity, private tutoring has little effect on their academic performance. Sensitivity analysis further shows that the heterogeneous effects of private tutoring differs across cognitive ability, subject types, and tutoring periods. The finding has important implications for understanding the consequences of China's policy interventions in terms of reducing educational inequality.","PeriodicalId":37302,"journal":{"name":"社会","volume":"9 1","pages":"250 - 282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"社会","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150X231169449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, with the rapid marketization of educational resources in K–12 education, private tutoring has become extremely popular in China, yet the previous research has not yet reached a consensus on the impact of private tutoring on academic outcomes, and has also overlooked the influence of individual choice under the exam-oriented educational system in China. By using data drawn from the China Education Panel Survey, this study examines the heterogeneous treatment effect of private tutoring on 8th graders’ academic performance from the perspective of individual choice. The results show that a propensity to attend private tutoring can differentiate the class disparities among middle school students in terms of individual, family, school, and other factors. Furthermore, the results indicate that private tutoring generally has limited impacts on academic achievement, net of all background factors. However, students whose propensity to attend private tutoring lies in the intermediate range tend to benefit the most from private tutoring. For both students from socioeconomically disadvantaged families with a low propensity and their advantaged counterparts with a high propensity, private tutoring has little effect on their academic performance. Sensitivity analysis further shows that the heterogeneous effects of private tutoring differs across cognitive ability, subject types, and tutoring periods. The finding has important implications for understanding the consequences of China's policy interventions in terms of reducing educational inequality.
教育资源市场化与个体选择:对中学私教异质性治疗效果的考察
近几十年来,随着K-12教育资源的快速市场化,家教在中国非常流行,但以往的研究尚未就家教对学业成果的影响达成共识,也忽略了中国应试教育体制下个人选择的影响。本研究利用中国教育小组调查的数据,从个体选择的角度考察了家教对八年级学生学业成绩的异质性治疗效应。结果表明,参加课外辅导的倾向可以区分中学生在个人、家庭、学校和其他因素方面的阶级差异。此外,研究结果表明,在所有背景因素的影响下,私人辅导对学业成绩的影响普遍有限。然而,参加私人辅导的倾向处于中间范围的学生往往从私人辅导中受益最大。对于低倾向的社会经济弱势家庭学生和高倾向的社会经济弱势家庭学生,家教对其学业成绩的影响都不大。敏感性分析进一步表明,私教的异质性效应在认知能力、科目类型和辅导时间上存在差异。这一发现对于理解中国在减少教育不平等方面的政策干预的后果具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
社会
社会 Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6799
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Sociology is a peer reviewed, international journal with the following standards: 1. The purpose of the Journal is to publish (in the English language) articles, reviews and scholarly comment which have been judged worthy of publication by appropriate specialists and accepted by the University on studies relating to sociology. 2. The Journal will be international in the sense that it will seek, wherever possible, to publish material from authors with an international reputation and articles that are of interest to an international audience. 3. In pursuit of the above the journal shall: (i) draw on and include high quality work from the international community . The Journal shall include work representing the major areas of interest in sociology. (ii) avoid bias in favour of the interests of particular schools or directions of research or particular political or narrow disciplinary objectives to the exclusion of others; (iii) ensure that articles are written in a terminology and style which makes them intelligible, not merely within the context of a particular discipline or abstract mode, but across the domain of relevant disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信