Procedural Formalities in Arbitration: Towards a Technologically Neutral Legal Framework

IF 0.2 Q3 LAW
M. Piers, Kevin Ongenae
{"title":"Procedural Formalities in Arbitration: Towards a Technologically Neutral Legal Framework","authors":"M. Piers, Kevin Ongenae","doi":"10.54648/joia2021002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the ongoing process of digitalization in arbitration proceedings, particularly in light of the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. It focuses on the different communications that occur throughout arbitration proceedings, i.e. written communication at the start and during the proceedings, oral communication at hearings, and the rendering of the arbitral award. The authors assess the past, present and future use of digital means of communication in relation to each of these instances, and analyse the extent to which the applicable legal framework (institutional rules, national laws, and the New York Convention) is actually an obstacle to digitalization. They find that the evolution towards more technologically oriented proceedings had already started, but that the COVID-19 pandemic will likely be a decisive step towards fully digital arbitration proceedings. The authors welcome that evolution, and argue that there are no overriding legal or policy arguments to hold back this trend.\nArbitration, Digitalization, COVID-19, Procedure, Formalities, Technology, Institutional Rules, Communication, Request for Arbitration, Remote Hearings, Electronic Awards","PeriodicalId":43527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Arbitration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2021002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article addresses the ongoing process of digitalization in arbitration proceedings, particularly in light of the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. It focuses on the different communications that occur throughout arbitration proceedings, i.e. written communication at the start and during the proceedings, oral communication at hearings, and the rendering of the arbitral award. The authors assess the past, present and future use of digital means of communication in relation to each of these instances, and analyse the extent to which the applicable legal framework (institutional rules, national laws, and the New York Convention) is actually an obstacle to digitalization. They find that the evolution towards more technologically oriented proceedings had already started, but that the COVID-19 pandemic will likely be a decisive step towards fully digital arbitration proceedings. The authors welcome that evolution, and argue that there are no overriding legal or policy arguments to hold back this trend. Arbitration, Digitalization, COVID-19, Procedure, Formalities, Technology, Institutional Rules, Communication, Request for Arbitration, Remote Hearings, Electronic Awards
仲裁中的程序程序:走向技术中立的法律框架
本文讨论了仲裁程序中正在进行的数字化进程,特别是考虑到最近的2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行。它侧重于整个仲裁程序中发生的不同沟通,即在诉讼开始和诉讼期间的书面沟通,听证会上的口头沟通以及仲裁裁决的提交。作者评估了与这些实例相关的数字通信手段的过去、现在和未来的使用,并分析了适用的法律框架(制度规则、国家法律和纽约公约)在多大程度上实际上是数字化的障碍。他们发现,向更加以技术为导向的仲裁程序的演变已经开始,但2019冠状病毒病大流行可能是迈向完全数字化仲裁程序的决定性一步。作者对这种演变表示欢迎,并认为没有压倒一切的法律或政策论据来阻止这一趋势。仲裁、数字化、COVID-19、程序、手续、技术、制度规则、沟通、仲裁请求、远程听证、电子裁决
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Since its 1984 launch, the Journal of International Arbitration has established itself as a thought provoking, ground breaking journal aimed at the specific requirements of those involved in international arbitration. Each issue contains in depth investigations of the most important current issues in international arbitration, focusing on business, investment, and economic disputes between private corporations, State controlled entities, and States. The new Notes and Current Developments sections contain concise and critical commentary on new developments. The journal’s worldwide coverage and bimonthly circulation give it even more immediacy as a forum for original thinking, penetrating analysis and lively discussion of international arbitration issues from around the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信