The COVID-19 vaccine evidence gap: Decisions without data for pregnant and breastfeeding women

A. Johnston
{"title":"The COVID-19 vaccine evidence gap: Decisions without data for pregnant and breastfeeding women","authors":"A. Johnston","doi":"10.18192/uojm.v11is1.5919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On March 11th, 2020, the Word Health Organization officially declared the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak a pandemic, setting in motion an unprecedented modern-day global public health response [1, 2]. Since that time, COVID-19’s impact has been wide-reaching and complex; influenced by a diverse set of biologic, clinical, psychologic, and sociodemographic factors [3, 4]. Indeed, not all members of society are at equal risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or experiencing severe infection-related outcomes [3, 4]. For example, older adults and individuals with comorbid conditions (e.g., cardiovascular disease) are at increased risk for severe disease [5]. Further, males are at higher risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes compared to females, underscoring the importance of including sex as a fundamental variable in the design and conduct of COVID-19 research [6]. Certainly, without sex-disaggregated data, it is impossible to know if, or to what extent, sex-specific approaches to the care and prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection should be employed [7].","PeriodicalId":30662,"journal":{"name":"University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18192/uojm.v11is1.5919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On March 11th, 2020, the Word Health Organization officially declared the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak a pandemic, setting in motion an unprecedented modern-day global public health response [1, 2]. Since that time, COVID-19’s impact has been wide-reaching and complex; influenced by a diverse set of biologic, clinical, psychologic, and sociodemographic factors [3, 4]. Indeed, not all members of society are at equal risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or experiencing severe infection-related outcomes [3, 4]. For example, older adults and individuals with comorbid conditions (e.g., cardiovascular disease) are at increased risk for severe disease [5]. Further, males are at higher risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes compared to females, underscoring the importance of including sex as a fundamental variable in the design and conduct of COVID-19 research [6]. Certainly, without sex-disaggregated data, it is impossible to know if, or to what extent, sex-specific approaches to the care and prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection should be employed [7].
新冠肺炎疫苗证据缺口:没有孕妇和哺乳期妇女数据的决定
2020年3月11日,世界卫生组织正式宣布严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型疫情为大流行,启动了前所未有的现代全球公共卫生应对措施[1,2]。自那时以来,新冠肺炎的影响是广泛和复杂的;受多种生物学、临床、心理和社会人口因素的影响[3,4]。事实上,并非所有社会成员感染严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型或经历严重感染相关后果的风险相同[3,4]。例如,老年人和患有合并症(如心血管疾病)的人患严重疾病的风险增加[5]。此外,与女性相比,男性患严重新冠肺炎后果的风险更高,这突出了将性别作为新冠肺炎研究设计和实施的基本变量的重要性[6]。当然,如果没有按性别分类的数据,就不可能知道是否应该或在多大程度上采用针对性别的方法来护理和预防严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染[7]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书