Affective Sciences: A Missing Link to Delivering the 2030 Agenda

IF 3 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Emotion Review Pub Date : 2023-08-13 DOI:10.1177/17540739231195046

Edward Mishaud, Eleonora Bonaccorsi, Alma Galicia Cruz

引用次数: 1

Abstract

At its mid-point of implementation, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development—and broader sustainability—is challenged by multiple crises facing the international community. Despite the unprecedented adoption of the 2030 Agenda by UN Member States in 2015, there are clear signals that there is inadequate progress on achieving the Agenda's 17 Sustainable Development Goals. This article aims to encourage discussion, from an affective research angle, on potential emotional barriers to SDG implementation. It equally strives to spur greater insight into how the field of affective sciences can help overcome these and other hurdles and provide invaluable insights and recommendations to bridge the gap between policy and practice.

查看原文本刊更多论文

情感科学:实现2030年议程的缺失环节

在实施中期，《2030年可持续发展议程》——以及更广泛的可持续性——受到国际社会面临的多重危机的挑战。尽管联合国会员国在2015年史无前例地通过了《2030年议程》，但有明确的信号表明，在实现《议程》的17个可持续发展目标方面进展不足。本文旨在鼓励从情感研究的角度讨论可持续发展目标实施的潜在情感障碍。它同样努力促使人们更深入地了解情感科学领域如何帮助克服这些和其他障碍，并为弥合政策与实践之间的差距提供宝贵的见解和建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Emotion Review PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

6.60

自引率

3.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Emotion Review is a fully peer reviewed scholarly journal. It adheres to a blinded peer review process in which the reviewer"s name is routinely withheld from the author unless the reviewer requests a preference for their identity to be revealed. All manuscripts are reviewed initially by the Editors and only those papers that meet the scientific and editorial standards of the journal, and fit within the aims and scope of the journal, will be sent for outside review. Emotion Review will focus on ideas about emotion, with "emotion" broadly defined. The Review will publish articles presenting new theories, offering conceptual analyses, reviewing the literature, and debating and critiquing conceptual issues.