Elham Nazari, Rizwana Biviji, Amir Hossein Farzin, Parnian Asgari, H. Tabesh
{"title":"Advantages and Challenges of Information Fusion Technique for Big Data Analysis: Proposed Framework","authors":"Elham Nazari, Rizwana Biviji, Amir Hossein Farzin, Parnian Asgari, H. Tabesh","doi":"10.18502/JBE.V7I2.6737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Recently, with the surge in the availability of relevant data in various industries, the use of Information Fusion technique for data analysis is increasing. This method has several advantages, such as increased accuracy, and the use of meaningful information. In addition, there are certain challenges, including the impact of data type and analytical method on results. The goal of this study is to propose a framework for introducing the advantages and classifying the challenges of this technique. \n Method: We conducted a review of articles published between January 1960 and December 2017 for the design stage and from January 2018 to December 2018 for the evaluation stage. Articles were identified from various databases such as Science Direct, IEEE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, using the keywords decision fusion, information fusion, and symbolic fusion. We report the advantages and challenges of the methodologies described in these articles. Analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. \n Results: A total of 132 articles were identified in the design stage and 90 articles were identified in the evaluation stage. Categories within the framework for challenges include “hardware and software requirements for processing and maintaining the process”, “data” and “data analysis method”. The categories for advantages include “value modeling”, “preferable management of uncertainty and variability”, “excellent decision making”, “comprehensive interpretation and representation”, “data management” and “simplicity of infrastructure”. Our results indicate using these two frameworks with 95% Confidence interval. \n Conclusion: An overall understanding of the advantages and challenges of the information fusion technique could act as a guide for the researcher for the correct usage of this technique.","PeriodicalId":34310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/JBE.V7I2.6737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Introduction: Recently, with the surge in the availability of relevant data in various industries, the use of Information Fusion technique for data analysis is increasing. This method has several advantages, such as increased accuracy, and the use of meaningful information. In addition, there are certain challenges, including the impact of data type and analytical method on results. The goal of this study is to propose a framework for introducing the advantages and classifying the challenges of this technique.
Method: We conducted a review of articles published between January 1960 and December 2017 for the design stage and from January 2018 to December 2018 for the evaluation stage. Articles were identified from various databases such as Science Direct, IEEE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, using the keywords decision fusion, information fusion, and symbolic fusion. We report the advantages and challenges of the methodologies described in these articles. Analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.
Results: A total of 132 articles were identified in the design stage and 90 articles were identified in the evaluation stage. Categories within the framework for challenges include “hardware and software requirements for processing and maintaining the process”, “data” and “data analysis method”. The categories for advantages include “value modeling”, “preferable management of uncertainty and variability”, “excellent decision making”, “comprehensive interpretation and representation”, “data management” and “simplicity of infrastructure”. Our results indicate using these two frameworks with 95% Confidence interval.
Conclusion: An overall understanding of the advantages and challenges of the information fusion technique could act as a guide for the researcher for the correct usage of this technique.
简介:最近,随着各行业相关数据的可用性激增,信息融合技术在数据分析中的应用越来越多。这种方法有几个优点,例如提高了准确性,并使用了有意义的信息。此外,还有一些挑战,包括数据类型和分析方法对结果的影响。本研究的目的是提出一个框架,介绍这项技术的优势并对其挑战进行分类。方法:我们对1960年1月至2017年12月期间发表的设计阶段和2018年1月到2018年12月之间发表的评估阶段的文章进行了回顾。文章使用决策融合、信息融合和符号融合等关键词,从Science Direct、IEEE、Scopus、Web of Science和Google Scholar等各种数据库中进行识别。我们报告了这些文章中描述的方法的优势和挑战。根据PRISMA指南进行分析。结果:共有132篇文章在设计阶段被鉴定,90篇文章在评估阶段被鉴定。挑战框架内的类别包括“处理和维护过程的硬件和软件要求”、“数据”和“数据分析方法”。优势类别包括“价值建模”、“更好地管理不确定性和可变性”、“卓越的决策”、“全面的解释和表示”、“数据管理”和“基础设施的简单性”。我们的结果表明,使用这两个框架的置信区间为95%。结论:全面了解信息融合技术的优势和挑战,可以为研究人员正确使用该技术提供指导。