Instrument Analysis of Biology Teachers' Needs to Assess Students' Creative Thinking Skills Using RASCH Model

Rezqi Rohmatika Sari, B. Sugiharto, S. Widoretno
{"title":"Instrument Analysis of Biology Teachers' Needs to Assess Students' Creative Thinking Skills Using RASCH Model","authors":"Rezqi Rohmatika Sari, B. Sugiharto, S. Widoretno","doi":"10.24042/tadris.v7i2.13265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to investigate the validity, reliability, scale understanding, item difficulties, and bias items of the instrument for analyzing the needs of biology teachers regarding the assessment of creative thinking skills using the RASCH model. The instrument was modified based on the indicators of divergent and convergent thinking processes in the scientific learning stages integrated with the dimensions of creative thinking skills by using ADDIE research model. The research participants comprised of 104 participants from the Solo Raya area, those of whom were 64 Senior High School Biology teachers and 40 Junior High School Science teachers. The research instrument used inventory with a Likert scale of 1 to 4. The instrument validity, reliability, scale understanding, item difficulties, and bias items were analyzed by applying the RASCH model using Winstep 3.73. The research results showed that the overall validity was acceptable, and the item validity did not need improvement. Overall reliability was very good, and the item reliability was excellent. Rating scale analysis showed respondents had understood the Linkert scale of 1 to 4 well. Based on the item difficulties results of the teachers' responses, it was found that there had not been any teachers who evaluated the indicators of creative thinking skills by using writings or pictures in problem-solving assessment. The bias test results on the instrument items indicated that five items could potentially be biased due to age difference, and the two others were due to gender type. Therefore, the development of assessment instruments for creative thinking skills with scientific and social problem-solving based assignments, as well as writing and visual expressions, is required.","PeriodicalId":31892,"journal":{"name":"Tadris Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tadris Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v7i2.13265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the validity, reliability, scale understanding, item difficulties, and bias items of the instrument for analyzing the needs of biology teachers regarding the assessment of creative thinking skills using the RASCH model. The instrument was modified based on the indicators of divergent and convergent thinking processes in the scientific learning stages integrated with the dimensions of creative thinking skills by using ADDIE research model. The research participants comprised of 104 participants from the Solo Raya area, those of whom were 64 Senior High School Biology teachers and 40 Junior High School Science teachers. The research instrument used inventory with a Likert scale of 1 to 4. The instrument validity, reliability, scale understanding, item difficulties, and bias items were analyzed by applying the RASCH model using Winstep 3.73. The research results showed that the overall validity was acceptable, and the item validity did not need improvement. Overall reliability was very good, and the item reliability was excellent. Rating scale analysis showed respondents had understood the Linkert scale of 1 to 4 well. Based on the item difficulties results of the teachers' responses, it was found that there had not been any teachers who evaluated the indicators of creative thinking skills by using writings or pictures in problem-solving assessment. The bias test results on the instrument items indicated that five items could potentially be biased due to age difference, and the two others were due to gender type. Therefore, the development of assessment instruments for creative thinking skills with scientific and social problem-solving based assignments, as well as writing and visual expressions, is required.
基于RASCH模型的生物教师评价学生创造性思维能力需求的仪器分析
本研究旨在运用RASCH模型,考察生物教师创造性思维能力评估需求分析工具的效度、信度、量表理解度、项目难度和偏倚项目。采用ADDIE研究模型,在科学学习阶段发散性和收敛性思维过程指标的基础上,结合创造性思维技能的维度对该量表进行了改进。研究对象包括来自Solo Raya地区的104名参与者,其中64名是高中生物教师,40名是初中科学教师。研究工具采用李克特量表1 - 4的量表。采用Winstep 3.73的RASCH模型分析量表效度、信度、量表理解、项目难度和偏倚项目。研究结果表明,整体效度可接受,项目效度不需改进。总体信度非常好,项目信度非常好。量表分析显示,受访者对1至4分的linkt量表理解较好。根据教师回答的题目难度结果,没有教师在问题解决评估中使用文字或图片来评估创造性思维技能的指标。仪器项目的偏倚检验结果表明,有5个项目可能因年龄差异而存在偏倚,另外2个项目可能因性别类型而存在偏倚。因此,需要开发评估工具,以评估创造性思维技能,以及基于科学和社会问题解决的作业,以及写作和视觉表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书