Poverty and educational achievement in the US: A less-biased estimate using PISA 2012 data

Q2 Social Sciences
david. rutkowski, Leslie Rutkowski, J. Wild, Nathan A. Burroughs
{"title":"Poverty and educational achievement in the US: A less-biased estimate using PISA 2012 data","authors":"david. rutkowski, Leslie Rutkowski, J. Wild, Nathan A. Burroughs","doi":"10.1080/10796126.2017.1401898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the current paper, we employ the most recent Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) data to calculate a less-biased estimate of poverty on US achievement. The PISA was specifically chosen as it is an assessment removed from a specific curriculum and instead focuses on concepts that students should know in order to participate in a global economy. Using a propensity score matching approach, our findings suggest that US students in poverty have notable educational attainment deficiencies compared to a matched group of students who are not in poverty. In other words, when we select two students who have a great deal in common but for the fact that one comes from a poverty background, the student in poverty is expected to perform nearly 28 points, or about a quarter of a standard deviation lower, on the PISA assessment. In real terms, this puts math achievement for children not in poverty on-par with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) average, while children in poverty are well below the OECD average.","PeriodicalId":35244,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children and Poverty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10796126.2017.1401898","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children and Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10796126.2017.1401898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the current paper, we employ the most recent Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) data to calculate a less-biased estimate of poverty on US achievement. The PISA was specifically chosen as it is an assessment removed from a specific curriculum and instead focuses on concepts that students should know in order to participate in a global economy. Using a propensity score matching approach, our findings suggest that US students in poverty have notable educational attainment deficiencies compared to a matched group of students who are not in poverty. In other words, when we select two students who have a great deal in common but for the fact that one comes from a poverty background, the student in poverty is expected to perform nearly 28 points, or about a quarter of a standard deviation lower, on the PISA assessment. In real terms, this puts math achievement for children not in poverty on-par with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) average, while children in poverty are well below the OECD average.
美国的贫困和教育成就:利用2012年国际学生评估项目(PISA)数据进行的不那么偏颇的估计
摘要在本文中,我们采用了最新的国际学生评估计划(PISA)数据来计算贫困对美国成绩的偏差较小的估计。之所以选择PISA,是因为它是一种从特定课程中删除的评估,而是关注学生为了参与全球经济而应该了解的概念。使用倾向得分匹配方法,我们的研究结果表明,与匹配的非贫困学生相比,美国贫困学生的教育程度明显不足。换言之,当我们选择两个有很多共同点但其中一个来自贫困背景的学生时,贫困学生在PISA评估中的表现预计会低近28分,或约四分之一的标准差。按实际价值计算,这使非贫困儿童的数学成绩与经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的平均水平持平,而贫困儿童则远低于经合组织的平均水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Children and Poverty
Journal of Children and Poverty Social Sciences-Demography
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信