Combining dependent p-values resulting from multiple effect size homogeneity tests in meta-analysis for binary outcomes

O. Almalik
{"title":"Combining dependent p-values resulting from multiple effect\nsize homogeneity tests in meta-analysis for binary outcomes","authors":"O. Almalik","doi":"10.7243/2053-7662-10-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Testing effect size homogeneity is an essential part when conducting a meta-analysis. Comparative studies of effect size homogeneity tests in case of binary outcomes are found in the literature, but no test has come out as an absolute winner. A alternative approach would be to carry out multiple effect size homogeneity tests on the same meta-analysis and combine the resulting dependent p-values. In this article we applied the correlated Lancaster method for dependent statistical tests. To investigate the proposed approach’s performance, we applied eight different effect size homogeneity tests on a case study and on simulated datasets, and combined the resulting p-values. The proposed method has similar performance to that of tests based on the score function in the presence of a effect size when the number of studies is small, but outperforms these tests as the number of studies increases. However, the method’s performance is sensitive to the correlation coefficient value assumed between dependent tests, and only performs well when this value is high. More research is needed to investigate the method’s assumptions on correlation in case of effect size homogeneity tests, and to study the method’s performance in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes.","PeriodicalId":91324,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical statistics and informatics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical statistics and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7243/2053-7662-10-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Testing effect size homogeneity is an essential part when conducting a meta-analysis. Comparative studies of effect size homogeneity tests in case of binary outcomes are found in the literature, but no test has come out as an absolute winner. A alternative approach would be to carry out multiple effect size homogeneity tests on the same meta-analysis and combine the resulting dependent p-values. In this article we applied the correlated Lancaster method for dependent statistical tests. To investigate the proposed approach’s performance, we applied eight different effect size homogeneity tests on a case study and on simulated datasets, and combined the resulting p-values. The proposed method has similar performance to that of tests based on the score function in the presence of a effect size when the number of studies is small, but outperforms these tests as the number of studies increases. However, the method’s performance is sensitive to the correlation coefficient value assumed between dependent tests, and only performs well when this value is high. More research is needed to investigate the method’s assumptions on correlation in case of effect size homogeneity tests, and to study the method’s performance in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes.
在二元结果的荟萃分析中组合多重效应大小同质性检验产生的依赖性p值
在进行荟萃分析时,检验效应大小的同质性是必不可少的部分。文献中对二元结果下的效应大小同质性检验进行了比较研究,但没有一项检验是绝对的赢家。另一种方法是在同一荟萃分析中进行多个效应大小的同质性测试,并结合由此产生的依赖性p值。在本文中,我们将相关Lancaster方法应用于相依统计检验。为了研究所提出的方法的性能,我们在一个案例研究和模拟数据集上应用了八种不同的效应大小同质性测试,并结合了所得的p值。当研究数量较少时,在存在效应大小的情况下,所提出的方法与基于得分函数的测试具有相似的性能,但随着研究数量的增加,其性能优于这些测试。然而,该方法的性能对依赖测试之间假设的相关系数值很敏感,并且只有当该值高时才表现良好。在效应大小同质性检验的情况下,需要更多的研究来调查该方法对相关性的假设,并研究该方法在连续结果荟萃分析中的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信