Outcomes of a non-randomised audit of single pigtail suture stents in urolithiasis management of Asian patients in Singapore

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ee Jean Lim , Zhen Wei Choo , Reshma Mangat , Pradeep Durai , Sarvajit Biligere , Yiquan Tan , Loh Hin Yeung Marcus , Nicole Andrea Seet Li Ting , Chin Tiong Heng , Stefania Ferreti , Vineet Gauhar
{"title":"Outcomes of a non-randomised audit of single pigtail suture stents in urolithiasis management of Asian patients in Singapore","authors":"Ee Jean Lim ,&nbsp;Zhen Wei Choo ,&nbsp;Reshma Mangat ,&nbsp;Pradeep Durai ,&nbsp;Sarvajit Biligere ,&nbsp;Yiquan Tan ,&nbsp;Loh Hin Yeung Marcus ,&nbsp;Nicole Andrea Seet Li Ting ,&nbsp;Chin Tiong Heng ,&nbsp;Stefania Ferreti ,&nbsp;Vineet Gauhar","doi":"10.1016/j.ajur.2022.03.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Double-J (DJ) ureteric stents are commonly placed perioperatively for semirigid or flexible ureteroscopic renal surgery. It is believed that lesser stent material within the bladder mitigates stent-related symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the J-Fil ureteral stent, a single pigtail suture stent compared with conventional DJ stent in relation to stent symptoms in an Asian population undergoing ureterorenal intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Based on internal audit committee recommendation approval, the records of 50 patients retrieved, available data of 41 patients who were prospectively enrolled into two groups (Group 1 [J-Fil stent group], <em>n</em>=21 and Group 2 [DJ stent group], <em>n</em>=20) between August 2020 to January 2021, were analysed. Parameters compared were nature of procedure, stone location and size, ease of deployment or removal, and complications. A modified universal stent symptom questionnaire was used to assess morbidity of stent symptoms within 48 h of insertion and at removal.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both groups had similar median age, distribution in male to female ratio, and stone size. The overall median universal stent symptom questionnaire score at insertion was similar for bladder pain, flank or loin pain, and quality of life between Group 1 and 2; however, at removal Group 1 fared significantly better than Group 2, especially for flank or loin pain and pain at voiding. Both groups had similar ease in insertion with no hospital readmissions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our audit favoured the single pigtail suture stent in Asian ureters in mitigating stent-related issues. It showed a good safety profile with easy deployment and removal. It promises a new standard in stenting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46599,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Urology","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 324-330"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388222001096/pdfft?md5=e052a12dfd164fd558d81eb7a69f7c7c&pid=1-s2.0-S2214388222001096-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388222001096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Double-J (DJ) ureteric stents are commonly placed perioperatively for semirigid or flexible ureteroscopic renal surgery. It is believed that lesser stent material within the bladder mitigates stent-related symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the J-Fil ureteral stent, a single pigtail suture stent compared with conventional DJ stent in relation to stent symptoms in an Asian population undergoing ureterorenal intervention.

Methods

Based on internal audit committee recommendation approval, the records of 50 patients retrieved, available data of 41 patients who were prospectively enrolled into two groups (Group 1 [J-Fil stent group], n=21 and Group 2 [DJ stent group], n=20) between August 2020 to January 2021, were analysed. Parameters compared were nature of procedure, stone location and size, ease of deployment or removal, and complications. A modified universal stent symptom questionnaire was used to assess morbidity of stent symptoms within 48 h of insertion and at removal.

Results

Both groups had similar median age, distribution in male to female ratio, and stone size. The overall median universal stent symptom questionnaire score at insertion was similar for bladder pain, flank or loin pain, and quality of life between Group 1 and 2; however, at removal Group 1 fared significantly better than Group 2, especially for flank or loin pain and pain at voiding. Both groups had similar ease in insertion with no hospital readmissions.

Conclusion

Our audit favoured the single pigtail suture stent in Asian ureters in mitigating stent-related issues. It showed a good safety profile with easy deployment and removal. It promises a new standard in stenting.

新加坡亚洲患者尿路结石治疗中单尾纤缝合支架的非随机审计结果
目的双J(Double-J)输尿管支架通常在半硬性或柔性输尿管镜肾脏手术的围手术期放置。一般认为,膀胱内较少的支架材料可减轻与支架相关的症状。本研究旨在评估在接受输尿管肾介入治疗的亚洲人群中,J-Fil输尿管支架(一种单尾缝合支架)与传统DJ支架在支架相关症状方面的比较。方法根据内部审计委员会的建议批准,检索了50例患者的记录,分析了2020年8月至2021年1月期间前瞻性入组两组(第1组[J-Fil支架组],n=21;第2组[DJ支架组],n=20)的41例患者的可用数据。比较的参数包括手术性质、结石位置和大小、植入或取出的难易程度以及并发症。结果 两组的中位年龄、男女比例和结石大小相似。第一组和第二组在插入时膀胱疼痛、侧腹或腰部疼痛以及生活质量方面的通用支架症状问卷总分中位数相似;但在取出时,第一组的情况明显好于第二组,尤其是在侧腹或腰部疼痛以及排尿疼痛方面。结论:我们的审计结果表明,在亚洲人的输尿管中采用单辫缝合支架可减轻与支架相关的问题。它具有良好的安全性,易于安装和移除。它有望成为支架植入术的新标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Urology
Asian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Urology (AJUR), launched in October 2014, is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal jointly founded by Shanghai Association for Science and Technology (SAST) and Second Military Medical University (SMMU). AJUR aims to build a communication platform for international researchers to effectively share scholarly achievements. It focuses on all specialties of urology both scientifically and clinically, with article types widely covering editorials, opinions, perspectives, reviews and mini-reviews, original articles, cases reports, rapid communications, and letters, etc. Fields of particular interest to the journal including, but not limited to: • Surgical oncology • Endourology • Calculi • Female urology • Erectile dysfunction • Infertility • Pediatric urology • Renal transplantation • Reconstructive surgery • Radiology • Pathology • Neurourology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信