Evaluating social drop-in facilities and their impact on social recovery in early intervention in psychosis services

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Jessica Lee, Donna Haskayne, Madihah Hussain, Abbas Darukhanawala, Charlotte Marriott
{"title":"Evaluating social drop-in facilities and their impact on social recovery in early intervention in psychosis services","authors":"Jessica Lee, Donna Haskayne, Madihah Hussain, Abbas Darukhanawala, Charlotte Marriott","doi":"10.1108/mhrj-04-2021-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\n“Social recovery” is a long-cited aim within the UK early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services; however, there is a lack of evidence regarding existing social recovery provisions and how these can be improved. This paper aims to evaluate an existing social drop-in facility within an EIP team, ran within the Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, and highlight the potential benefits of delivering such services for people diagnosed with first episode psychosis.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAttendance and basic demographic statistics (age, gender and ethnicity of attendees) were collected over a period of 13 weeks. In addition, two semi-structured focus groups were conducted: one with EIP staff members (community psychiatric nurses and support workers) and the other with current service users, with both groups describing their satisfaction and experience of the drop-in facility and how it can be improved.\n\n\nFindings\nInductive thematic analysis was used to analyse data from both focus groups, with six overarching meta-themes being identified: reflection, environment, emotional experience, recovery, activities and interactions. Service users and staff reflected that the drop-in facility was an asset to the service, although work could be done to improve overall attendance.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper explores how a social drop-in facility can provide a supportive, positive environment that aids recovery from psychosis for service users and improves working conditions for the EIP staff.\n","PeriodicalId":45687,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Review Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhrj-04-2021-0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose “Social recovery” is a long-cited aim within the UK early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services; however, there is a lack of evidence regarding existing social recovery provisions and how these can be improved. This paper aims to evaluate an existing social drop-in facility within an EIP team, ran within the Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, and highlight the potential benefits of delivering such services for people diagnosed with first episode psychosis. Design/methodology/approach Attendance and basic demographic statistics (age, gender and ethnicity of attendees) were collected over a period of 13 weeks. In addition, two semi-structured focus groups were conducted: one with EIP staff members (community psychiatric nurses and support workers) and the other with current service users, with both groups describing their satisfaction and experience of the drop-in facility and how it can be improved. Findings Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse data from both focus groups, with six overarching meta-themes being identified: reflection, environment, emotional experience, recovery, activities and interactions. Service users and staff reflected that the drop-in facility was an asset to the service, although work could be done to improve overall attendance. Originality/value This paper explores how a social drop-in facility can provide a supportive, positive environment that aids recovery from psychosis for service users and improves working conditions for the EIP staff.
在精神病服务的早期干预中评估设施中的社会落差及其对社会康复的影响
“社会恢复”是英国精神病早期干预(EIP)服务长期引用的目标;然而,缺乏关于现有社会恢复规定以及如何加以改进的证据。本文旨在评估EIP团队中现有的社会辅助设施,该团队在伯明翰和索利赫尔精神健康NHS基金会信托基金内运行,并强调为被诊断为首发精神病的人提供此类服务的潜在好处。设计/方法/方法在13周的时间内收集出席率和基本人口统计数据(参加者的年龄、性别和种族)。此外,还进行了两个半结构化的焦点小组:一个是EIP工作人员(社区精神科护士和支持工作者),另一个是目前的服务用户,两组都描述了他们对临时设施的满意度和体验,以及如何改进。归纳主题分析用于分析来自两个焦点小组的数据,确定了六个总体元主题:反思、环境、情感体验、恢复、活动和互动。服务使用者和工作人员反映,上门服务设施是该服务的一项资产,尽管可以采取措施提高总体出勤率。原创性/价值本文探讨了社会探视设施如何提供一个支持性的、积极的环境,以帮助服务使用者从精神病中康复,并改善EIP工作人员的工作条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信