“We need a fence!” The spectacle of border militarization in Israel and in the USA

Q3 Social Sciences
D. Simonneau
{"title":"“We need a fence!” The spectacle of border militarization in Israel and in the USA","authors":"D. Simonneau","doi":"10.1590/1980-85852503880006409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This article presents an analysis of the contemporary phenomenon commonly referred to as the “multiplication of walls”, namely the militarization of borderlands. It considers border enforcement as a policy solution about mobility portrayed as “undesirable”, propounded by politicians, security professionals and citizens’ groups for their own political benefit and interest. The “wall” is thus apprehended through a political spectacle intended for fenced-in citizens. To dissect the wall spectacle, the article resorts to an international comparison in two different geopolitical cases. The comparison specifically focuses on mobilizations in favor of “border/security fences” in Israel from 2001 and Arizona (USA) from 2010. It identifies three analogous political operations led by these actors (problematization of mobility, securitization into a military response and publicization of pro-fence narratives), and thus characterizes the manufacture of border militarization from a bottom-up perspective, while illustrating their national variations.","PeriodicalId":31224,"journal":{"name":"REMHU Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REMHU Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-85852503880006409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. This article presents an analysis of the contemporary phenomenon commonly referred to as the “multiplication of walls”, namely the militarization of borderlands. It considers border enforcement as a policy solution about mobility portrayed as “undesirable”, propounded by politicians, security professionals and citizens’ groups for their own political benefit and interest. The “wall” is thus apprehended through a political spectacle intended for fenced-in citizens. To dissect the wall spectacle, the article resorts to an international comparison in two different geopolitical cases. The comparison specifically focuses on mobilizations in favor of “border/security fences” in Israel from 2001 and Arizona (USA) from 2010. It identifies three analogous political operations led by these actors (problematization of mobility, securitization into a military response and publicization of pro-fence narratives), and thus characterizes the manufacture of border militarization from a bottom-up perspective, while illustrating their national variations.
“我们需要一个栅栏!”以色列和美国边境军事化的奇观
摘要本文分析了通常被称为“围墙倍增”的当代现象,即边疆的军事化。它认为,边境执法是一种针对流动性的政策解决方案,被政治家、安全专业人士和公民团体为了自己的政治利益和利益而提出,这种解决方案被描述为“不受欢迎的”。因此,“墙”是通过一种旨在为被围起来的公民提供的政治景观来理解的。为了剖析长城奇观,本文在两个不同的地缘政治案例中进行了国际比较。比较特别集中在2001年以色列和2010年美国亚利桑那州支持“边界/安全围栏”的动员。它确定了由这些行动者领导的三种类似的政治行动(流动性的问题化,军事反应的证券化和支持围栏叙事的宣传),从而从自下而上的角度描述了边境军事化的制造,同时说明了它们的国家差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信