The Evaluation of Relationship Between Dimensions of Organizational Structure and Safety and Health Situation in Stone Industries

dnshnmh Srm Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.52547/sjrm.5.4.205
‌Ali Hosseini, H. Akbari, A. Bahrami, F. Karamali
{"title":"The Evaluation of Relationship Between Dimensions of Organizational Structure and Safety and Health Situation in Stone Industries","authors":"‌Ali Hosseini, H. Akbari, A. Bahrami, F. Karamali","doi":"10.52547/sjrm.5.4.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"in industry For data collection, organizational structure standard questionnaire and ELMERI safety and health checklist. The sample size consisted of 90 stone factories. After collecting information, the score of each questionnaire was calculated and converted on the basis of 100. For quantitative variables, independent t-test and ANOVA tests were used. Chi-square test was used for qualitative variables. For multivariate analysis, multiple linear regression analysis was carried out. Results: The coefficient of linear correlation between overall score of organizational structure with safety situation for Saab and Ghulebor stations were -0.348 and -0. 232 (P<0.05), respectively. At Saab station, the highest number of cases was related to safe behaviors with an average of 74.4 and the lowest was industrial health with an average of 45.8. At Ghulebor station, score of 65.6 was related to fire safety and first aid, industrial health had a score of 45.8. The highest linear correlation at Ghulebor and Saab station was between safety and health with recognition (-0.531) (-0.626). Conclusion: The results of the present study showed safety and health can be improved by modifying the organizational structure. Organizations with horizontal and vertical complexity, focus, instructions, formal correspondence, rules and regulations have a greater impact on safety and health status.","PeriodicalId":33200,"journal":{"name":"dnshnmh Srm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"dnshnmh Srm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/sjrm.5.4.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

in industry For data collection, organizational structure standard questionnaire and ELMERI safety and health checklist. The sample size consisted of 90 stone factories. After collecting information, the score of each questionnaire was calculated and converted on the basis of 100. For quantitative variables, independent t-test and ANOVA tests were used. Chi-square test was used for qualitative variables. For multivariate analysis, multiple linear regression analysis was carried out. Results: The coefficient of linear correlation between overall score of organizational structure with safety situation for Saab and Ghulebor stations were -0.348 and -0. 232 (P<0.05), respectively. At Saab station, the highest number of cases was related to safe behaviors with an average of 74.4 and the lowest was industrial health with an average of 45.8. At Ghulebor station, score of 65.6 was related to fire safety and first aid, industrial health had a score of 45.8. The highest linear correlation at Ghulebor and Saab station was between safety and health with recognition (-0.531) (-0.626). Conclusion: The results of the present study showed safety and health can be improved by modifying the organizational structure. Organizations with horizontal and vertical complexity, focus, instructions, formal correspondence, rules and regulations have a greater impact on safety and health status.
石材行业组织结构维度与安全卫生状况的关系评价
在行业中用于数据收集、组织结构标准问卷和ELMERI安全与健康检查表。样本量包括90家石材厂。在收集信息后,计算每个问卷的得分,并以100为基础进行转换。对于定量变量,使用独立t检验和方差分析检验。定性变量采用卡方检验。多元分析采用多元线性回归分析。结果:Saab站和Ghulebor站组织结构总分与安全状况的线性相关系数分别为-0.348和-0。232(P<0.05)。萨博站的病例数最高,平均为74.4例,与安全行为有关,最低的是工业健康,平均为45.8例。在Ghulebor车站,消防安全和急救得分为65.6,工业卫生得分为45.8。Ghulebor和Saab站的安全和健康与认可度之间的线性相关性最高(-0.531)(-0.626)。结论:本研究的结果表明,通过改变组织结构可以改善安全和健康。具有横向和纵向复杂性、重点、指示、正式信函、规章制度的组织对安全和健康状况的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信