Psychometric Analysis of Scores on the Social Justice Scale (SJS) with a Human Services University Sample

IF 2 4区心理学 Q2 Psychology

Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.1080/07481756.2023.2226877

Katherine Hales, Julie Sriken, Bradley T. Erford, M. Sherman, Heather L. Smith

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Social Justice Scale (SJS) and various subscales were studied on a sample of 414 human services university undergraduates. Internal consistency (α = .93), discriminant validity, and response bias were adequate. The 4-factor model demonstrated an excellent fit. Implications were discussed for use of the SJS in practice and research.

查看原文本刊更多论文

以人文服务大学为样本的社会公正量表(SJS)得分的心理测量分析

摘要采用社会公正量表（SJS）和各种分量表对414名为人类服务的大学本科生进行了研究。内部一致性（α=.93）、判别有效性和反应偏倚是足够的。4因子模型显示出极好的拟合性。讨论了SJS在实践和研究中的应用意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development Multiple-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development is an official journal of the Association of Assessment and Research in Counseling (AARC), a member association and division of the American Counseling Association. Articles range in appeal from those that deal with theoretical and other problems of the measurement specialist to those directed to the administrator, the counselor, or the personnel worker--in schools and colleges, public and private agencies, business, industry, and government. All articles clearly describe implications for the counseling field and for practitioners, educators, administrators, researchers, or students in assessment, measurement, and evaluation.