Affective Spaces: Migration in Scandinavian and German Transnational Narratives by Anja Tröger (review)

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES
Thomas M. Herold
{"title":"Affective Spaces: Migration in Scandinavian and German Transnational Narratives by Anja Tröger (review)","authors":"Thomas M. Herold","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2023.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a scholar of the Holocaust and contemporary antisemitism, I personally see a counter-narrative within Thurman’s work, one that highlights a “trade” of sorts between America and Germany, with German Jews coming to America and becoming leading composers and scholars in Hollywood, Broadway, and the academy, and African Americans engaging in the inverse and finding their success in Europe. At the core of all of this is the systemic discrimination that drives our colonial heritages. Thurman’s work is especially timely when music academics such as Philip Ewell and Justin London consider the current state of our field fraught with questions of music theory’s “white racial frame,” gender, and race. In Justin London’s recent article in MTO: A Journal of the Society for Music Theory, “A Bevy of Biases: How Music Theory’s Methodological Problems Hinder Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” (March 2022), he asks how we can expand the canon while simultaneously avoiding tokenism and a rhetoric of “exception” or “uniqueness.” Thurman’s historiography is one answer to this question: demonstrating that history has a bountiful number of examples that, on their own, exhibit the “qualifications” deemed necessary for access into the canon. A “great” composer’s work is only as good as its performance (yes, contrary to long belief). The Black classical musicians that Thurman showcases are just a few of the strong individuals who conveyed musical greatness, a greatness that defied the systemic challenges with which their own country continues to affront them. To quote Thurman, “[Singing Like Germans] encourages us to consider what happened when Black classical musicians defied [white] expectations, to linger in those moments when [Black classical musicians] sang music that did not supposedly ‘look like them,’ when they performed brilliantly and under considerable scrutiny” (18). Kathryn Agnes Huether, Bowdoin College","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2023.0034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a scholar of the Holocaust and contemporary antisemitism, I personally see a counter-narrative within Thurman’s work, one that highlights a “trade” of sorts between America and Germany, with German Jews coming to America and becoming leading composers and scholars in Hollywood, Broadway, and the academy, and African Americans engaging in the inverse and finding their success in Europe. At the core of all of this is the systemic discrimination that drives our colonial heritages. Thurman’s work is especially timely when music academics such as Philip Ewell and Justin London consider the current state of our field fraught with questions of music theory’s “white racial frame,” gender, and race. In Justin London’s recent article in MTO: A Journal of the Society for Music Theory, “A Bevy of Biases: How Music Theory’s Methodological Problems Hinder Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” (March 2022), he asks how we can expand the canon while simultaneously avoiding tokenism and a rhetoric of “exception” or “uniqueness.” Thurman’s historiography is one answer to this question: demonstrating that history has a bountiful number of examples that, on their own, exhibit the “qualifications” deemed necessary for access into the canon. A “great” composer’s work is only as good as its performance (yes, contrary to long belief). The Black classical musicians that Thurman showcases are just a few of the strong individuals who conveyed musical greatness, a greatness that defied the systemic challenges with which their own country continues to affront them. To quote Thurman, “[Singing Like Germans] encourages us to consider what happened when Black classical musicians defied [white] expectations, to linger in those moments when [Black classical musicians] sang music that did not supposedly ‘look like them,’ when they performed brilliantly and under considerable scrutiny” (18). Kathryn Agnes Huether, Bowdoin College
情感空间:斯堪的纳维亚和德国跨国叙事中的移民
作为一名研究大屠杀和当代反犹主义的学者,我个人在瑟曼的作品中看到了一种相反的叙述,一种强调美国和德国之间某种“交易”的叙述,德国犹太人来到美国,成为好莱坞、百老汇和学术界的主要作曲家和学者,而非裔美国人则从事相反的工作,并在欧洲取得了成功。所有这一切的核心是推动我们殖民遗产的系统性歧视。当菲利普·尤厄尔(Philip Ewell)和贾斯汀·伦敦(Justin London)等音乐学者考虑到音乐理论中充斥着“白人种族框架”、性别和种族等问题时,瑟曼的工作尤其及时。在贾斯汀伦敦最近在MTO的文章:音乐理论学会杂志,“一群偏见:音乐理论的方法论问题如何阻碍多样性,公平和包容性”(2022年3月),他问我们如何扩大经典,同时避免象征性和“例外”或“独特性”的修辞。瑟曼的史学是这个问题的一个答案:证明历史上有大量的例子,它们本身就展示了被认为是进入正典所必需的“资格”。一个“伟大的”作曲家的作品只和它的表演一样好(是的,与长期以来的信念相反)。瑟曼所展示的黑人古典音乐家只是传达音乐伟大的强大个体中的一小部分,这种伟大无视了他们自己的国家继续侮辱他们的系统性挑战。引用瑟曼的话,“[像德国人一样唱歌]鼓励我们去思考当黑人古典音乐家无视[白人]的期望时发生了什么,当[黑人古典音乐家]唱的音乐不像他们的时候,当他们表现出色,受到相当多的审查时”(18)。凯瑟琳·艾格尼丝·休特,鲍登学院
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信