Das Verhältnis zwischen Hieroglyphen- und Keilschrift-Luwisch

Q2 Arts and Humanities
F. Breyer
{"title":"Das Verhältnis zwischen Hieroglyphen- und Keilschrift-Luwisch","authors":"F. Breyer","doi":"10.1515/aofo-2022-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The linguistic differences between Hieroglyphic and Cuneiform Luwian have long been known. However, it is unclear how these should be assessed: How exactly do the two varieties relate to each other? Are they different dialects, just different registers or even different sociolects? Based on the thesis developed recently, according to which the transformation of the Luwian hieroglyphs into a veritable writing system only took place in the context of the late Hittite empire, this article works out that Hieroglyphic Luwian probably is to be considered a functiolect.","PeriodicalId":53535,"journal":{"name":"Altorientalische Forschungen","volume":"49 1","pages":"18 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Altorientalische Forschungen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/aofo-2022-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The linguistic differences between Hieroglyphic and Cuneiform Luwian have long been known. However, it is unclear how these should be assessed: How exactly do the two varieties relate to each other? Are they different dialects, just different registers or even different sociolects? Based on the thesis developed recently, according to which the transformation of the Luwian hieroglyphs into a veritable writing system only took place in the context of the late Hittite empire, this article works out that Hieroglyphic Luwian probably is to be considered a functiolect.
象形文字和楔形文字的关系
象形文字和楔形文字鲁维语之间的语言差异早已为人所知。然而,目前尚不清楚应该如何评估这些:这两个品种究竟是如何相互关联的?它们是不同的方言,只是不同的语域,甚至是不同的社会学?根据最近发展起来的一篇论文,即卢维象形文字向真正的书写系统的转变是在赫梯帝国晚期才发生的,本文认为象形卢维文字可能是一种功能选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Altorientalische Forschungen
Altorientalische Forschungen Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信