Providing a framework for optimizing a mixing design of reactive powder concrete (RPC)

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Farid Ghaffari Moghaddam, A. Akbarpour, A. Firouzi
{"title":"Providing a framework for optimizing a mixing design of reactive powder concrete (RPC)","authors":"Farid Ghaffari Moghaddam, A. Akbarpour, A. Firouzi","doi":"10.2478/otmcj-2020-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Suitable distribution of particles and the presence of hydration lead to the improved compressive performance and optimum (even reduced) cost in the production of reactive powder concrete (RPC). This study was conducted to obtain a better understanding of RPC and analyze the behavior of modified RPC (MRPC) using the properties of surface resistivity, water penetration, compressive strength, and modulus of elasticity, apart from the cost. The present study was carried out to investigate how to optimize the size and diversity of the aggregate in order to increase the applications and reduce the costs. The options were selected from among the 12 alternatives classified during the construction stages. According to the six weighting parameters used for comparing with the sample, the derived framework can be described as a mixing design for RPC. Five weighting criteria were considered with values of one of the five criteria missing, and in one case, all criteria were taken with equal weights. For the final analysis, the Expert Choice software was used to create a framework for the optimal mix design of RPC and MRPC. The MRPC mixing designs showed good results, with very slight differences compared to RPC. In many cases, MRPC can be used instead of RPC.","PeriodicalId":42309,"journal":{"name":"Organization Technology and Management in Construction","volume":"13 1","pages":"2438 - 2449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Technology and Management in Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2020-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Suitable distribution of particles and the presence of hydration lead to the improved compressive performance and optimum (even reduced) cost in the production of reactive powder concrete (RPC). This study was conducted to obtain a better understanding of RPC and analyze the behavior of modified RPC (MRPC) using the properties of surface resistivity, water penetration, compressive strength, and modulus of elasticity, apart from the cost. The present study was carried out to investigate how to optimize the size and diversity of the aggregate in order to increase the applications and reduce the costs. The options were selected from among the 12 alternatives classified during the construction stages. According to the six weighting parameters used for comparing with the sample, the derived framework can be described as a mixing design for RPC. Five weighting criteria were considered with values of one of the five criteria missing, and in one case, all criteria were taken with equal weights. For the final analysis, the Expert Choice software was used to create a framework for the optimal mix design of RPC and MRPC. The MRPC mixing designs showed good results, with very slight differences compared to RPC. In many cases, MRPC can be used instead of RPC.
为优化活性粉末混凝土(RPC)的混合设计提供框架
摘要在活性粉末混凝土(RPC)的生产中,颗粒的适当分布和水化的存在提高了抗压性能,并优化(甚至降低)了成本。本研究旨在更好地了解RPC,并利用表面电阻率、透水性、抗压强度和弹性模量等特性分析改性RPC(MRPC)的性能(除成本外)。本研究旨在研究如何优化骨料的尺寸和多样性,以增加应用并降低成本。这些方案是从施工阶段分类的12个备选方案中选择的。根据用于与样本进行比较的六个加权参数,导出的框架可以描述为RPC的混合设计。考虑了五个加权标准,其中一个标准的值缺失,在一个案例中,所有标准的权重相等。最后,使用Expert Choice软件创建RPC和MRPC的最佳配合比设计框架。MRPC混合设计显示出良好的效果,与RPC相比差异非常小。在许多情况下,可以使用MRPC代替RPC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信