La paradoja de los sistemas de participación ciudadana y el despertar de las insurgencias en Chile

IF 0.1 Q4 ECONOMICS
Christian Quinteros Flores
{"title":"La paradoja de los sistemas de participación ciudadana y el despertar de las insurgencias en Chile","authors":"Christian Quinteros Flores","doi":"10.29192/claeh.40.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2019, Chilean society went through one of its greatest social and political crises in memory, revealing high levels of social and territorial inequality and fostering a process of profound institutional changes. A year later, deepening those gaps and slowing changes, the pandemic appeared as a pause in institutional redefinitions. As effects of both crises, today the country is experiencing an exponential increase in land seizures, prosecution and discrediting of the political system, changes in the traditional political axes, increase in populism and debates on the development model to be adopted, and, as a cross-cutting issue, profound questions to the traditional forms of social participation in a democratic system. It is precisely in this last aspect that the paradox offered by Chilean institutions in terms of social participation is noticed. With a robust and multi-channel design of participation spaces, the institutionality presents at the same time, high rates of disaffection in traditional systems but a sustained increase in social up-heaval and the effective incidence of activist groups. This essay contextualizes, from the perspective of governance, the new institutional challenges in terms of citizen partici-pation that the country must take on when drafting a new Political Constitution.","PeriodicalId":40608,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos del CLAEH-Centro Latinoamericano de Economia Humana","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos del CLAEH-Centro Latinoamericano de Economia Humana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29192/claeh.40.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2019, Chilean society went through one of its greatest social and political crises in memory, revealing high levels of social and territorial inequality and fostering a process of profound institutional changes. A year later, deepening those gaps and slowing changes, the pandemic appeared as a pause in institutional redefinitions. As effects of both crises, today the country is experiencing an exponential increase in land seizures, prosecution and discrediting of the political system, changes in the traditional political axes, increase in populism and debates on the development model to be adopted, and, as a cross-cutting issue, profound questions to the traditional forms of social participation in a democratic system. It is precisely in this last aspect that the paradox offered by Chilean institutions in terms of social participation is noticed. With a robust and multi-channel design of participation spaces, the institutionality presents at the same time, high rates of disaffection in traditional systems but a sustained increase in social up-heaval and the effective incidence of activist groups. This essay contextualizes, from the perspective of governance, the new institutional challenges in terms of citizen partici-pation that the country must take on when drafting a new Political Constitution.
公民参与制度的悖论与智利叛乱的觉醒
2019年,智利社会经历了有史以来最大的社会和政治危机之一,揭示了高度的社会和领土不平等,并推动了一个深刻的制度变革进程。一年后,随着这些差距的加深和变化的放缓,这场疫情似乎是机构重新定义的暂停。由于这两次危机的影响,今天,该国正经历着土地征用、政治制度的起诉和抹黑、传统政治轴心的改变、民粹主义的增加和对将要采用的发展模式的辩论,以及作为一个贯穿各领域的问题,对民主制度中传统形式的社会参与提出了深刻的问题。正是在这最后一个方面,人们注意到智利机构在社会参与方面提出的悖论。随着参与空间的稳健和多渠道设计,制度性同时呈现出传统制度中的高不满率,但社会动荡和激进团体的有效发生率持续增加。本文从治理的角度阐述了国家在起草新的政治宪法时必须在公民参与方面面临的新的制度挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信