An examination of trends in the growing scientific literature on approaching wildlife with drones

IF 1.3 Q3 REMOTE SENSING
M. Mo, Katarina Bonatakis
{"title":"An examination of trends in the growing scientific literature on approaching wildlife with drones","authors":"M. Mo, Katarina Bonatakis","doi":"10.1139/dsa-2021-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drones or unoccupied aerial vehicles are rapidly being used for a spectrum of applications, including replacing traditional occupied aircraft as a means of approaching wildlife from the air. Though less intrusive to wildlife than occupied aircraft, drones can still cause varying levels of disturbance. Policies and protocols to guide lowest-impact drone flights are most likely to succeed if considerations are derived from knowledge from scientific literature. This study examines trends in the scientific literature on using drones to approach wildlife between 2000 and 2020, specifically in relation to the type of publications, scientific journals works are published in, the purposes of drone flights reported, taxa studied, and locations of studies. From 223 publications, we observed a large increase in relevant scientific literature, the majority of which were peer-reviewed articles published across 87 scientific journals. The largest proportions of peer-reviewed research articles related to aquatic mammals or aquatic birds, and the use or trial of drone flights for conducting population surveys, animal detection or investigations of animal responses to drone flights. The largest proportion of articles were studies conducted in North America and Australia. Since animal responses to drone flights vary between taxa, populations, and geographic locations, we encourage further growth in the volume of relevant scientific literature needed to inform policies and protocols for specific taxa and/or locations, particularly where knowledge gaps exist.","PeriodicalId":45619,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/dsa-2021-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Drones or unoccupied aerial vehicles are rapidly being used for a spectrum of applications, including replacing traditional occupied aircraft as a means of approaching wildlife from the air. Though less intrusive to wildlife than occupied aircraft, drones can still cause varying levels of disturbance. Policies and protocols to guide lowest-impact drone flights are most likely to succeed if considerations are derived from knowledge from scientific literature. This study examines trends in the scientific literature on using drones to approach wildlife between 2000 and 2020, specifically in relation to the type of publications, scientific journals works are published in, the purposes of drone flights reported, taxa studied, and locations of studies. From 223 publications, we observed a large increase in relevant scientific literature, the majority of which were peer-reviewed articles published across 87 scientific journals. The largest proportions of peer-reviewed research articles related to aquatic mammals or aquatic birds, and the use or trial of drone flights for conducting population surveys, animal detection or investigations of animal responses to drone flights. The largest proportion of articles were studies conducted in North America and Australia. Since animal responses to drone flights vary between taxa, populations, and geographic locations, we encourage further growth in the volume of relevant scientific literature needed to inform policies and protocols for specific taxa and/or locations, particularly where knowledge gaps exist.
关于用无人机接近野生动物的越来越多的科学文献的趋势研究
无人机或无人驾驶飞行器正迅速被用于一系列应用,包括取代传统的有人驾驶飞机,成为从空中接近野生动物的一种手段。尽管无人机对野生动物的干扰比有人驾驶的飞机要小,但仍然会造成不同程度的干扰。如果考虑因素来自科学文献中的知识,指导影响最小的无人机飞行的政策和协议最有可能成功。本研究考察了2000年至2020年间使用无人机接近野生动物的科学文献的趋势,特别是与出版物类型、发表的科学期刊、报告的无人机飞行目的、研究的分类群和研究地点有关的趋势。从223份出版物中,我们观察到相关科学文献的大量增加,其中大多数是发表在87份科学期刊上的同行评议文章。与水生哺乳动物或水鸟有关的同行评议研究文章的比例最大,以及使用或试验无人机飞行进行人口调查,动物探测或调查动物对无人机飞行的反应。文章中比例最大的是在北美和澳大利亚进行的研究。由于动物对无人机飞行的反应因分类群、种群和地理位置而异,我们鼓励进一步增加相关科学文献的数量,为特定分类群和/或地点的政策和协议提供信息,特别是在存在知识空白的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信