Tourism Scholars' Confusion About the Locus of Causality and Locus of Control Theories

IF 2 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Tourism Pub Date : 2023-02-21 DOI:10.37741/t.71.1.6
M. Saleh, Karina Bogatyreva
{"title":"Tourism Scholars' Confusion About the Locus of Causality and Locus of Control Theories","authors":"M. Saleh, Karina Bogatyreva","doi":"10.37741/t.71.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tourists’ behavior has caused unprecedented studies to understand it. However, recent literature has exposed the fragility of understanding and reviewing tourist attribution, especially those established on the locus dimension. The locus dimension studies how tourists assign responsibilities to tourism events, whether internal and/or external causes. However, tourism literature is confused while utilizing the locus dimension. Tourism scholars mix between locus of causality (LOC) and locus of control (LOC) theories. Both have the same abbreviation, but both have different approaches. Therefore, the current study provides a new theoretical review tendency by applying a new concept, namely locus of personal traits (LOPT), with new measurement items for (LOC) and (LOPT). The study revealed that, far from the rhetoric occasionally linked with the locus of control, using the locus of personal traits will mitigate the substantial gap.","PeriodicalId":46641,"journal":{"name":"Tourism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37741/t.71.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Tourists’ behavior has caused unprecedented studies to understand it. However, recent literature has exposed the fragility of understanding and reviewing tourist attribution, especially those established on the locus dimension. The locus dimension studies how tourists assign responsibilities to tourism events, whether internal and/or external causes. However, tourism literature is confused while utilizing the locus dimension. Tourism scholars mix between locus of causality (LOC) and locus of control (LOC) theories. Both have the same abbreviation, but both have different approaches. Therefore, the current study provides a new theoretical review tendency by applying a new concept, namely locus of personal traits (LOPT), with new measurement items for (LOC) and (LOPT). The study revealed that, far from the rhetoric occasionally linked with the locus of control, using the locus of personal traits will mitigate the substantial gap.
旅游学者对因果点与控制点理论的困惑
游客的行为引起了前所未有的研究来理解它。然而,最近的文献暴露了对游客归因的理解和回顾的脆弱性,尤其是那些建立在轨迹维度上的游客归因。轨迹维度研究游客如何分配旅游事件的责任,无论是内部和/或外部原因。然而,旅游文献在利用轨迹维度时却存在混淆。旅游学者混淆了因果点理论和控制点理论。两者的缩写相同,但方法不同。因此,当前的研究通过应用一个新的概念,即个人特质位点(LOPT),以及新的(LOC)和(LOPT的)测量项目,提供了一种新的理论回顾趋势。研究表明,与偶尔与控制基因座联系在一起的修辞不同,使用个人特质基因座将缓解巨大的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tourism
Tourism HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal TOURISM is an international academic and professional quarterly which welcomes articles on various aspects of travel and tourism. Th e journal emphasises the broadness and interrelatedness of the tourism sector. Manuscripts submitted to the Journal can be processed quickly if they are prepared according to the following guidelines. Manuscripts will be returned to the author with a set of instructions if they are not submitted according to our style guide. No contribution will be accepted which has been published elsewhere, unless it is specifi cally invited or agreed by the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信