Inter-Rater Reliability of the Pizzi Health and Wellness Assessment (PHWA).

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-15 DOI:10.1080/07380577.2022.2088916
Michael A Pizzi, John Damiao
{"title":"Inter-Rater Reliability of the Pizzi Health and Wellness Assessment (PHWA).","authors":"Michael A Pizzi, John Damiao","doi":"10.1080/07380577.2022.2088916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study is to determine the inter-rater reliability of the Pizzi Health and Wellness Assessment (PHWA) by comparing the consistency in scores between clients and their caregivers in the following areas of participation: <i>social, physical, family, occupational, mental/emotional,</i> and <i>spiritual</i>. A retrospective inter-rater correlational design was used to analyze the agreement of scores from a convenience sample consisting of two groups: clients with disabilities (n = 19) and their healthy caregivers (n = 19). Inter-rater reliability was calculated using correlations for the PHWA as a whole, and for the <i>current level of participation</i> and <i>wishing to improve participation</i> subsections. Inter-rater reliability as calculated by an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, and either the Pearson or Spearman rho correlation and found to be reliable between clients and caregivers (<i>r<sub>ICC</sub></i> = .636, <i>p</i> < .001; <i>rho</i> = .642, <i>p</i> < .001). More specifically, current level of participation demonstrated acceptable reliability (r<sub>ICC</sub> = .513, p < .001; r = .521, p < .001) as did wishing to improve participation (r<sub>ICC</sub> = .689, p < .001; r = .725, p < .001). This supports the PHWA as a clinically relevant health and wellness occupational therapy assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46157,"journal":{"name":"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE","volume":"1 1","pages":"414-423"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2022.2088916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine the inter-rater reliability of the Pizzi Health and Wellness Assessment (PHWA) by comparing the consistency in scores between clients and their caregivers in the following areas of participation: social, physical, family, occupational, mental/emotional, and spiritual. A retrospective inter-rater correlational design was used to analyze the agreement of scores from a convenience sample consisting of two groups: clients with disabilities (n = 19) and their healthy caregivers (n = 19). Inter-rater reliability was calculated using correlations for the PHWA as a whole, and for the current level of participation and wishing to improve participation subsections. Inter-rater reliability as calculated by an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, and either the Pearson or Spearman rho correlation and found to be reliable between clients and caregivers (rICC = .636, p < .001; rho = .642, p < .001). More specifically, current level of participation demonstrated acceptable reliability (rICC = .513, p < .001; r = .521, p < .001) as did wishing to improve participation (rICC = .689, p < .001; r = .725, p < .001). This supports the PHWA as a clinically relevant health and wellness occupational therapy assessment.

Pizzi健康和健康评估(PHWA)的评分者间可靠性。
本研究的目的是通过比较客户及其护理人员在以下参与领域的得分一致性来确定Pizzi健康与健康评估(PHWA)的评分者间可靠性:社会、身体、家庭、职业、心理/情感和精神。采用回顾性评分者间相关设计分析了便利样本的得分一致性,该样本由两组组成:残疾客户(n = 19) 以及他们健康的照顾者(n = 19) 。使用整个PHWA的相关性,以及当前参与水平和希望改进参与部分的相关性,计算评分者间的可靠性。通过组内相关系数和Pearson或Spearman rho相关性计算的评分者间可靠性,发现在客户和护理人员之间是可靠的(rCC=.636,p<.001;rho=.642,p<0.001)。更具体地说,目前的参与水平证明了可接受的可靠性(rCC=.513,p<.001;r=.521,p<0.001),以及希望提高参与度(rCC=.689,p<001;r=.725,p<-001)。这支持PHWA作为临床相关的健康和身心健康职业治疗评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Occupational Therapy in Health Care is a journal of contemporary practice in occupational therapy. It provides occupational therapy practitioners with a forum to stay up-to-date on current methods and theories in the field. Focused on everyday practice, the journal addresses the concerns of new and experienced therapists, presenting innovations in client evaluations and treatments, current research findings, critical reviews of current textbooks, descriptions of novel programs and descriptions of fieldwork innovations. An essential guide to the changing trends in health care, social services, and education, Occupational Therapy in Health Care provides occupational therapy practitioners with a forum to stay up-to-date on current methods and theories in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信