From subjects of knowledge to subjects of integration? Newly arrived students with limited schooling in Swedish education policy

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Brännström
{"title":"From subjects of knowledge to subjects of integration? Newly arrived students with limited schooling in Swedish education policy","authors":"M. Brännström","doi":"10.1177/1757743820986835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The education of newly arrived students is a debated global policy issue. Less attention has been paid to the sub-group of students with limited experience of schooling, referred to here as ‘newly arrived students with limited schooling’ (NALS). This article explores Swedish policy frameworks that inform the education of newly arrived students, comparing policy approaches from two time periods (1983–1996 and 2013–2016) during which the numbers of NALS were said to be increasing in Swedish compulsory schools. Framed within a poststructural approach to policy analysis and Foucault’s theorisation of heterotopian spaces, the analysis explores policies’ representation of separate teaching groups for newly arrived students, with a particular focus on what these spaces have to offer NALS. The findings indicate a shift between the two periods: from a focus on knowledge acquisition in policies of the 1980s and 1990s towards an emphasis on integration in those of the 2010s. This shift is particularly evident in relation to NALS, whose educational needs are discussed only to a limited extent in relation to subject knowledge in the 2010s policies. It is argued that this serves to homogenise the educational needs of the category newly arrived, thereby potentially obscuring the conception of NALS.","PeriodicalId":37109,"journal":{"name":"Power and Education","volume":"13 1","pages":"14 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1757743820986835","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Power and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1757743820986835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The education of newly arrived students is a debated global policy issue. Less attention has been paid to the sub-group of students with limited experience of schooling, referred to here as ‘newly arrived students with limited schooling’ (NALS). This article explores Swedish policy frameworks that inform the education of newly arrived students, comparing policy approaches from two time periods (1983–1996 and 2013–2016) during which the numbers of NALS were said to be increasing in Swedish compulsory schools. Framed within a poststructural approach to policy analysis and Foucault’s theorisation of heterotopian spaces, the analysis explores policies’ representation of separate teaching groups for newly arrived students, with a particular focus on what these spaces have to offer NALS. The findings indicate a shift between the two periods: from a focus on knowledge acquisition in policies of the 1980s and 1990s towards an emphasis on integration in those of the 2010s. This shift is particularly evident in relation to NALS, whose educational needs are discussed only to a limited extent in relation to subject knowledge in the 2010s policies. It is argued that this serves to homogenise the educational needs of the category newly arrived, thereby potentially obscuring the conception of NALS.
从知识主体到整合主体?瑞典教育政策中受教育程度有限的新移民学生
新来的学生的教育是一个有争议的全球政策问题。对受教育经验有限的学生这一子群体的关注较少,在这里被称为“受教育经验受限的新来学生”(NALS)。本文探讨了为新来学生的教育提供信息的瑞典政策框架,比较了两个时期(1983-1996年和2013-2016年)的政策方法,据说在这两个时期,瑞典义务学校的NALS数量正在增加。该分析以政策分析的后结构方法和福柯对异托比空间的理论为框架,探讨了政策对新来学生独立教学群体的代表性,特别关注这些空间能为NALS提供什么。研究结果表明,这两个时期之间发生了转变:从20世纪80年代和90年代政策中注重知识获取,到2010年代政策中强调一体化。这种转变在NALS中尤为明显,在2010年代的政策中,NALS的教育需求仅在有限的程度上与学科知识有关。有人认为,这有助于将新来的类别的教育需求同质化,从而可能模糊NALS的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Power and Education
Power and Education Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信