Taxation policy and regulation efficiency on increasing zakat collection: countries comparison analysis

Fauzul Hanif Noor Athief, Mohammad Aulia Rachman, Darlin Rizki, Lukmanul Hakim, Mohd Shahid Bin Mohd Noh
{"title":"Taxation policy and regulation efficiency on increasing zakat collection: countries comparison analysis","authors":"Fauzul Hanif Noor Athief, Mohammad Aulia Rachman, Darlin Rizki, Lukmanul Hakim, Mohd Shahid Bin Mohd Noh","doi":"10.21580/jiafr.2022.4.2.14168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - This study investigated the policies over countries, specifically concerning the taxation in its regard with the zakat collection. The aim is to see whether making zakat compulsory helps solving zakat collection problem or not.Method - The study used a descriptive analysis model with a qualitative approach.  The range of data collected in 2006-2017 came from nine countries, namely Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Sudan, Jordan, Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Pakistan.Result - The results of this study indicate that Sudan, Brunei Darussalam, Singapore and Pakistan follow a mandatory approach while Malaysia, Kuwait, Indonesia, Jordan and Saudi Arabia follow a voluntary approach.  It was also found that a mandatory approach attracted more zakat collection as indicated by the zakat collection ratio.Implication - Pointing out that mandating zakat by imposing it through regulations helps collect more zakat payments.Originality - This research specifically contributes to studying the tax system in various countries to stimulate the collection of zakat by using a comparative study.","PeriodicalId":34570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21580/jiafr.2022.4.2.14168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose - This study investigated the policies over countries, specifically concerning the taxation in its regard with the zakat collection. The aim is to see whether making zakat compulsory helps solving zakat collection problem or not.Method - The study used a descriptive analysis model with a qualitative approach.  The range of data collected in 2006-2017 came from nine countries, namely Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Sudan, Jordan, Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Pakistan.Result - The results of this study indicate that Sudan, Brunei Darussalam, Singapore and Pakistan follow a mandatory approach while Malaysia, Kuwait, Indonesia, Jordan and Saudi Arabia follow a voluntary approach.  It was also found that a mandatory approach attracted more zakat collection as indicated by the zakat collection ratio.Implication - Pointing out that mandating zakat by imposing it through regulations helps collect more zakat payments.Originality - This research specifically contributes to studying the tax system in various countries to stimulate the collection of zakat by using a comparative study.
提高天课税征收的税收政策和监管效率:各国比较分析
目的——本研究调查了各国的政策,特别是与天课征收有关的税收。目的是看看强制执行天课是否有助于解决天课收集问题。方法:本研究采用描述性分析模型和定性方法。2006-2017年收集的数据范围来自9个国家,即沙特阿拉伯、科威特、苏丹、约旦、文莱达鲁萨兰国、马来西亚、印度尼西亚、新加坡、巴基斯坦。研究还发现,强制性方法吸引了更多的天课收集,如天课收集比率所示。含义-指出通过法规强制执行天课有助于收取更多天课付款。独创性-本研究通过比较研究,专门有助于研究各国的税收制度,以刺激天课的征收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信