The Foundations of EU Administrative Law as a Scholarly Field: Functional Comparison, Normativism and Integration

IF 1.6 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

European Constitutional Law Review Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1017/S1574019622000438

Joana Mendes

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Functional comparison of administrative laws – Development of EU administrative law based on a state-matrix of general principles – Jürgen Schwarze’s approach – Choices of object, objectives, method, assumptions and normative implications – Structural features of the EU administration versus the binary liberty-authority of core principles of national administrative law – Liberal normativist approach – Contemporary critical examination of the legacy of comparative administrative law

查看原文本刊更多论文

欧盟行政法作为一个学术领域的基础：功能比较、规范主义与一体化

行政法的功能比较-基于一般原则的国家矩阵的欧盟行政法的发展- j rgen Schwarze的方法-对象、目标、方法、假设和规范含义的选择-欧盟行政的结构特征与国家行政法核心原则的二元自由权威-自由规范主义方法-当代对比较行政法遗产的批判性检查

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Constitutional Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process.