Anti-Liberal, Anti-Establishment or Constituency-Driven? Spatial Econometric Analysis of Polish Parliamentary Election Results in 2015

IF 0.4 Q4 GEOGRAPHY
Aleksandra Lasoń, Andrzej Torój
{"title":"Anti-Liberal, Anti-Establishment or Constituency-Driven? Spatial Econometric Analysis of Polish Parliamentary Election Results in 2015","authors":"Aleksandra Lasoń, Andrzej Torój","doi":"10.18778/1231-1952.26.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We investigated the spatial variation patterns of voting results in Polish parliamentary election in 2015 across 380 regions. That election was a milestone event in Polish politics that substantially affected Poland’s internal and foreign policy directions and promoted two emerging political parties as runners-up against the well-established ones. While socio-economic, cultural and geographical factors such as economic activity, historical legacies (post-Russian East vs post-German West) and economic dichotomies (cities vs the countryside) explain most variations for most parties, they do not appeared to fit as determinants of the new parties’ support, especially of right-wing populists. Demographic target groups of individual parties appear to be relatively unresponsive to their pre-election offerings. The spatial specification of econometric models considerably improves their statistical properties. We also examined mixed-W models to account for the unobservable spatial effects stemming from the construction of constituencies. Their distinctive sets of candidates added significantly to the explanation of the spatial variation in voting.","PeriodicalId":43719,"journal":{"name":"European Spatial Research and Policy","volume":"26 1","pages":"199 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spatial Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.26.2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract We investigated the spatial variation patterns of voting results in Polish parliamentary election in 2015 across 380 regions. That election was a milestone event in Polish politics that substantially affected Poland’s internal and foreign policy directions and promoted two emerging political parties as runners-up against the well-established ones. While socio-economic, cultural and geographical factors such as economic activity, historical legacies (post-Russian East vs post-German West) and economic dichotomies (cities vs the countryside) explain most variations for most parties, they do not appeared to fit as determinants of the new parties’ support, especially of right-wing populists. Demographic target groups of individual parties appear to be relatively unresponsive to their pre-election offerings. The spatial specification of econometric models considerably improves their statistical properties. We also examined mixed-W models to account for the unobservable spatial effects stemming from the construction of constituencies. Their distinctive sets of candidates added significantly to the explanation of the spatial variation in voting.
反自由主义、反建制还是选民驱动?2015年波兰议会选举结果的空间计量分析
摘要:本文研究了2015年波兰议会选举中380个地区投票结果的空间变异格局。那次选举是波兰政治的一个里程碑事件,它极大地影响了波兰的内政和外交政策方向,并推动两个新兴政党与老牌政党竞争,成为第二名。虽然社会经济、文化和地理因素,如经济活动、历史遗产(后俄罗斯东部vs后德国西部)和经济二分法(城市vs农村)解释了大多数政党的大多数变化,但它们似乎并不适合作为新政党支持的决定因素,特别是右翼民粹主义者。个别政党的人口目标群体似乎对他们的选前提议反应相对迟钝。计量经济模型的空间规范大大提高了其统计性质。我们还检验了混合w模型,以解释由选区建设引起的不可观察的空间效应。他们独特的候选人组合显著地解释了投票的空间差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信