Caregiver/child ratio and group size in Scandinavian Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC): a systematic review of qualitative research

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
N. Dalgaard, Anja Bondebjerg, Lone Svinth
{"title":"Caregiver/child ratio and group size in Scandinavian Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC): a systematic review of qualitative research","authors":"N. Dalgaard, Anja Bondebjerg, Lone Svinth","doi":"10.1080/19012276.2022.2137567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of the present systematic review was dual: 1) to systematically identify and present all qualitative research exploring caregiver/child ratio and group size in Scandinavian Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) for children aged 0–5 years, and 2) to synthesize the results from included studies in order to explore how the structural aspects of the ECEC setting (ratio and group size) are perceived to influence the everyday life experiences, development, and wellbeing of children. All studies exploring caregiver/child ratio and group size in ECEC in Scandinavia using qualitative methods were included. Systematic electronic searches were carried out in Socindex, PsycINFO, ERIC, Academic Search Premier, Science Citation Index, Sociological Abstracts, Cristin, Forskningsbasen, Libris, Norart, Swemed, and BIBSYS between September 2020 and February 2022. Furthermore, hand searches and snowballing strategies were used to identify relevant studies. The final selection included 12 studies in the review. The quality of all included studies was assessed independently by two review authors. After critical appraisal, the thematic analysis was conducted using data from 11 studies as one included study was deemed to be of insufficient quality. Findings within the thematic synthesis highlight ways in which group size and caregiver/child ratio influence caregiver/child interactions, children’s interactions, behavior, development, and learning as perceived by caregivers and observers and the caregivers’ perceptions on what constitutes optimal group size and caregiver/child ratio in ECEC. No study included in the review used interviews with children or parents, and thus future research is needed in order to explore children’s perspectives on these central structural characteristics of the ECEC setting.","PeriodicalId":51815,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2022.2137567","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the present systematic review was dual: 1) to systematically identify and present all qualitative research exploring caregiver/child ratio and group size in Scandinavian Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) for children aged 0–5 years, and 2) to synthesize the results from included studies in order to explore how the structural aspects of the ECEC setting (ratio and group size) are perceived to influence the everyday life experiences, development, and wellbeing of children. All studies exploring caregiver/child ratio and group size in ECEC in Scandinavia using qualitative methods were included. Systematic electronic searches were carried out in Socindex, PsycINFO, ERIC, Academic Search Premier, Science Citation Index, Sociological Abstracts, Cristin, Forskningsbasen, Libris, Norart, Swemed, and BIBSYS between September 2020 and February 2022. Furthermore, hand searches and snowballing strategies were used to identify relevant studies. The final selection included 12 studies in the review. The quality of all included studies was assessed independently by two review authors. After critical appraisal, the thematic analysis was conducted using data from 11 studies as one included study was deemed to be of insufficient quality. Findings within the thematic synthesis highlight ways in which group size and caregiver/child ratio influence caregiver/child interactions, children’s interactions, behavior, development, and learning as perceived by caregivers and observers and the caregivers’ perceptions on what constitutes optimal group size and caregiver/child ratio in ECEC. No study included in the review used interviews with children or parents, and thus future research is needed in order to explore children’s perspectives on these central structural characteristics of the ECEC setting.
斯堪的纳维亚幼儿教育与护理(ECEC)中的照顾者/儿童比例和群体规模:定性研究的系统综述
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Psychology
Nordic Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信