MDCO-700, a New Generation Anesthetic: Evaluation of Two Formulations in Sprague-Dawley Rats

M. Sabet, Ziad Tarazi, N. Joshi, B. Zerler, D. Rains, D. Griffith
{"title":"MDCO-700, a New Generation Anesthetic: Evaluation of Two Formulations in Sprague-Dawley Rats","authors":"M. Sabet, Ziad Tarazi, N. Joshi, B. Zerler, D. Rains, D. Griffith","doi":"10.15226/2374-684x/5/1/00156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: MDCO-700(cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate) is a novel, potent, positive allosteric modulator of the γ-Aminobutyric Acid type A (GABAA) receptor currently being developed for general anesthesia and procedural sedation. Early studies were conducted with a formulation that had to be stored at frozen conditions. A new formulation was developed to enable storage under refrigerated conditions. The original formulation (MDCO-700-F1) and the new formulation (MDCO-700-F2) were both prepared in Sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin (Sbeβcd), however MDCO-700-F2 was prepared at a lower concentration and higher pH in order to improve long-term storage stability. The objective of this study was to compare the anesthetic effects of both formulations in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Methods: Rats received doses of either MDCO-700-F1 or MDCO700-F2 ranging from1 to 6 mg/kg. Doses were administered as an intravenous bolus over 5 seconds via surgically implanted jugular vein cannulas. Immediately after the bolus, rats were turned supine and the clinical signs of anesthesia were monitored until they returned to normal behavior. The relationships between dose and the anesthetic effects of MDCO-700 were analyzed and modeledusing pharmacodynamic models. Results: Both formulations rapidly produced similar dosedependent depths of sedation with increasing effect at higher doses. The time required for recovery, as assessed using qualitative and semi-quantitative metrics, increased with increasing dose and was similar for the two formulations. The dose-response for all measured parameters including arousal level, duration of action and full recovery were similar for both formulations. Conclusion: nder the conditions of this study, the data demonstrates that both formulations of MDCO-700 produced equivalent anesthetic effects in rats across the concentration range tested. These results suggest that either formulation can be used for ongoing clinical development.","PeriodicalId":74840,"journal":{"name":"SOJ anesthesiology & pain management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOJ anesthesiology & pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15226/2374-684x/5/1/00156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: MDCO-700(cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate) is a novel, potent, positive allosteric modulator of the γ-Aminobutyric Acid type A (GABAA) receptor currently being developed for general anesthesia and procedural sedation. Early studies were conducted with a formulation that had to be stored at frozen conditions. A new formulation was developed to enable storage under refrigerated conditions. The original formulation (MDCO-700-F1) and the new formulation (MDCO-700-F2) were both prepared in Sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin (Sbeβcd), however MDCO-700-F2 was prepared at a lower concentration and higher pH in order to improve long-term storage stability. The objective of this study was to compare the anesthetic effects of both formulations in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Methods: Rats received doses of either MDCO-700-F1 or MDCO700-F2 ranging from1 to 6 mg/kg. Doses were administered as an intravenous bolus over 5 seconds via surgically implanted jugular vein cannulas. Immediately after the bolus, rats were turned supine and the clinical signs of anesthesia were monitored until they returned to normal behavior. The relationships between dose and the anesthetic effects of MDCO-700 were analyzed and modeledusing pharmacodynamic models. Results: Both formulations rapidly produced similar dosedependent depths of sedation with increasing effect at higher doses. The time required for recovery, as assessed using qualitative and semi-quantitative metrics, increased with increasing dose and was similar for the two formulations. The dose-response for all measured parameters including arousal level, duration of action and full recovery were similar for both formulations. Conclusion: nder the conditions of this study, the data demonstrates that both formulations of MDCO-700 produced equivalent anesthetic effects in rats across the concentration range tested. These results suggest that either formulation can be used for ongoing clinical development.
MDCO-700,新一代麻醉剂:两种制剂在Sprague-Dawley大鼠中的评价
背景:MDCO-700(环丙基甲氧羰基美咪酯)是一种新型的、有效的γ-氨基丁酸a型(GABAA)受体的正变构调节剂,目前正在开发用于全身麻醉和程序镇静。早期的研究是用一种必须在冷冻条件下储存的配方进行的。开发了一种新的配方,可以在冷藏条件下储存。原配方(MDCO-700-F1)和新配方(MDCO-700-F2)都是在磺基丁基醚-β-环糊精(sheβ cd)中制备的,但为了提高长期储存的稳定性,MDCO-700-F2在较低的浓度和较高的pH下制备。本研究的目的是比较两种配方对雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠的麻醉效果。方法:大鼠接受MDCO-700-F1或mdco -700- f2剂量,剂量范围为1 ~ 6mg /kg。剂量是通过手术植入颈静脉插管在5秒内静脉注射。在给药后,立即将大鼠转为仰卧,并监测麻醉的临床症状,直到它们恢复正常行为。采用药效学模型分析了MDCO-700剂量与麻醉效果的关系。结果:两种剂型均能迅速产生相似的剂量依赖性镇静深度,且剂量越大,镇静效果越好。使用定性和半定量指标评估的恢复所需时间随着剂量的增加而增加,并且两种制剂的恢复时间相似。所有测量参数的剂量反应,包括唤醒水平、作用持续时间和完全恢复,在两种制剂中是相似的。结论:在本研究条件下,数据显示MDCO-700两种剂型在测试浓度范围内对大鼠产生相当的麻醉作用。这些结果表明,任何一种制剂都可以用于正在进行的临床开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信