USG-Guided Percutaneous Aspiration: an Effective Way for Managing Appendicular Abscess

Tarafder Habibullah, D. Das, D. Paul
{"title":"USG-Guided Percutaneous Aspiration: an Effective Way for Managing Appendicular Abscess","authors":"Tarafder Habibullah, D. Das, D. Paul","doi":"10.3329/JEMC.V9I1.39905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: During last 2−3 decades image-guided drainage procedures have been developed complementing modern surgical drainage techniques. The development of interventional radiological procedure has made percutaneous puncture and drainage of abdominal fluid collection possible. Image-guided percutaneous drainage of appendicular abscess has become well-established because of its proven safety and efficacy. \nObjectives: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of USG-guided percutaneous aspiration for draining appendicular abscess with special attention to the need for conversion and to see the nature of complications after draining of abscess. \nMaterials and Methods: Between May 2013 to May 2014, 25 cases of appendicular abscess were selected from the admitted patients (surgery department) in Enam Medical College & Hospital who underwent USG-guided percutaneous aspiration. Procedure was performed mostly under local anaesthesia. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Interval appendicectomy was not performed routinely. \nResults: USG-guided aspiration was successful in 23 (92%) patients and in 2 (8%) patients procedure failed. Single attempt was successful in 21 (84%) cases and 4 (16%) patients needed double attempt for draining appendicular abscess. In 23 (92%) patients, PCA was done under local anaesthesia and two (8%) patients needed general anaesthesia. Complications developed in 4 (16%) patients. Four (16%) patients needed follow-up USG. Average hospital stay was 5 days (2−8 days) and average duration of using I/V antibiotic was 3.5 days (2−5 days). \nConclusion: USG-guided percutaneous aspiration is an easy and safe method for draining appendicular abscess with minimum procedural complications. \nJ Enam Med Col 2019; 9(1): 41-45","PeriodicalId":30472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enam Medical College","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/JEMC.V9I1.39905","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enam Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/JEMC.V9I1.39905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During last 2−3 decades image-guided drainage procedures have been developed complementing modern surgical drainage techniques. The development of interventional radiological procedure has made percutaneous puncture and drainage of abdominal fluid collection possible. Image-guided percutaneous drainage of appendicular abscess has become well-established because of its proven safety and efficacy. Objectives: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of USG-guided percutaneous aspiration for draining appendicular abscess with special attention to the need for conversion and to see the nature of complications after draining of abscess. Materials and Methods: Between May 2013 to May 2014, 25 cases of appendicular abscess were selected from the admitted patients (surgery department) in Enam Medical College & Hospital who underwent USG-guided percutaneous aspiration. Procedure was performed mostly under local anaesthesia. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Interval appendicectomy was not performed routinely. Results: USG-guided aspiration was successful in 23 (92%) patients and in 2 (8%) patients procedure failed. Single attempt was successful in 21 (84%) cases and 4 (16%) patients needed double attempt for draining appendicular abscess. In 23 (92%) patients, PCA was done under local anaesthesia and two (8%) patients needed general anaesthesia. Complications developed in 4 (16%) patients. Four (16%) patients needed follow-up USG. Average hospital stay was 5 days (2−8 days) and average duration of using I/V antibiotic was 3.5 days (2−5 days). Conclusion: USG-guided percutaneous aspiration is an easy and safe method for draining appendicular abscess with minimum procedural complications. J Enam Med Col 2019; 9(1): 41-45
USG引导下经皮穿刺抽吸:治疗阑尾脓肿的有效方法
背景:在过去的二三十年里,图像引导引流程序已经发展起来,补充了现代外科引流技术。介入放射学的发展使经皮穿刺引流腹腔积液成为可能。图像引导下经皮阑尾脓肿引流术因其安全性和有效性而得到广泛认可。目的:评估USG引导下经皮穿刺抽吸引流阑尾脓肿的安全性和可行性,特别注意转换的必要性,并了解脓肿引流后并发症的性质。材料和方法:2013年5月至2014年5月,从搪瓷医学院和医院的住院患者(外科)中选择25例阑尾脓肿患者,他们接受了USG引导的经皮穿刺抽吸。手术主要在局部麻醉下进行。随访6个月。间隔性阑尾切除术没有常规进行。结果:USG引导下抽吸成功的患者有23例(92%),失败的患者有2例(8%)。21例(84%)患者一次引流成功,4例(16%)患者需要两次引流阑尾脓肿。23名(92%)患者在局部麻醉下进行PCA,2名(8%)患者需要全身麻醉。4名(16%)患者出现并发症。4名(16%)患者需要随访USG。平均住院时间为5天(2−8天),使用I/V抗生素的平均持续时间为3.5天(2–5天)。结论:USG引导下经皮穿刺引流阑尾脓肿是一种简单、安全的引流方法,并发症最少。搪瓷医学杂志2019;9(1):41-45
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信