A platform penalty for news? How social media context can alter information credibility online

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
A. Agadjanian, Jacob Cruger, Sydney House, Annie Huang, Noah Kanter, C. Kearney, Junghye Kim, Isabelle Leonaitis, Sarah Petroni, Leonardo Placeres, Morgan Quental, Henry Sanford, Cameron Skaff, Jennifer Wu, Lillian Zhao, B. Nyhan
{"title":"A platform penalty for news? How social media context can alter information credibility online","authors":"A. Agadjanian, Jacob Cruger, Sydney House, Annie Huang, Noah Kanter, C. Kearney, Junghye Kim, Isabelle Leonaitis, Sarah Petroni, Leonardo Placeres, Morgan Quental, Henry Sanford, Cameron Skaff, Jennifer Wu, Lillian Zhao, B. Nyhan","doi":"10.1080/19331681.2022.2105465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Growing concern about dubious information online threatens the credibility of legitimate news. We examine two possible mechanisms for this effect on social media. First, people might view all news on social media as less credible. Second, questionable information elsewhere in a news feed might discredit legitimate news coverage. Findings from a preregistered experiment confirm that people see information on Facebook as less credible than identical information on news websites, though the effect is small, suggesting that observational data overstates this platform penalty. Prior exposure to low (versus high) credibility information on Facebook also reduces engagement with a target article, but not its perceived credibility. However, exploratory analyses show that the effects of prior exposure to low credibility information vary depending on the plausibility of the target article, decreasing the credibility of a less plausible article (a spillover effect) but increasing the credibility of a more plausible one (a contrast effect).","PeriodicalId":47047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","volume":"20 1","pages":"338 - 348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2105465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Growing concern about dubious information online threatens the credibility of legitimate news. We examine two possible mechanisms for this effect on social media. First, people might view all news on social media as less credible. Second, questionable information elsewhere in a news feed might discredit legitimate news coverage. Findings from a preregistered experiment confirm that people see information on Facebook as less credible than identical information on news websites, though the effect is small, suggesting that observational data overstates this platform penalty. Prior exposure to low (versus high) credibility information on Facebook also reduces engagement with a target article, but not its perceived credibility. However, exploratory analyses show that the effects of prior exposure to low credibility information vary depending on the plausibility of the target article, decreasing the credibility of a less plausible article (a spillover effect) but increasing the credibility of a more plausible one (a contrast effect).
对新闻的平台处罚?社交媒体环境如何改变在线信息的可信度
人们对网上可疑信息的日益关注威胁着合法新闻的可信度。我们研究了社交媒体上这种影响的两种可能机制。首先,人们可能会认为社交媒体上的所有新闻都不那么可信。其次,信息流中其他地方的可疑信息可能会使合法的新闻报道失去可信度。一项预先注册的实验结果证实,人们认为Facebook上的信息比新闻网站上的相同信息更不可信,尽管这种影响很小,这表明观察数据夸大了这种平台惩罚。先前在Facebook上接触低可信度(相对于高可信度)的信息也会降低目标文章的参与度,但不会降低其感知可信度。然而,探索性分析表明,先前接触低可信度信息的影响取决于目标文章的可信度,降低了不太可信的文章的可信度(溢出效应),但增加了更可信的文章的可信度(对比效应)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信