Care crises and care fixes under Covid-19: the example of transnational live-in care work

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Sarah Schilliger, Karin Schwiter, J. Steiner
{"title":"Care crises and care fixes under Covid-19: the example of transnational live-in care work","authors":"Sarah Schilliger, Karin Schwiter, J. Steiner","doi":"10.1080/14649365.2022.2073608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic brought care work to the forefront of attention. In many countries in the Global North, people became painfully aware that they had ‘outsourced’ a considerable share of this work to temporary migrants. Travel restrictions and lockdown measures disrupted transnational care arrangements and threatened the continuous provision of care. This article uses the example of transnationally organised live-in care in Switzerland to explore measures implemented to maintain care provision during the pandemic. Particularly, it investigates the impacts of these measures on the working conditions and lives of live-in care workers. We build on Emma Dowling’s conceptualisation of ‘care fixes’ and Brigitte Aulenbacher’s notions of ‘abstraction’ and ‘appropriation’ to identify three short-term solutions and argue that they did not solve, but rather only displaced the underlying care crisis. Our insights are based on the analysis of policy documents, 32 in-depth interviews and informal conversations with workers, clients, care agencies and other experts carried out in Switzerland between April 2020 and April 2021. We emphasise the inequalities implicated in transnational care arrangements and their inherent fragility, both of which were exacerbated by the pandemic. We tentatively point to avenues for contestation and for a revaluation of care, which opened up as result of the pandemic-induced disruption of care.","PeriodicalId":48072,"journal":{"name":"Social & Cultural Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social & Cultural Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2022.2073608","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic brought care work to the forefront of attention. In many countries in the Global North, people became painfully aware that they had ‘outsourced’ a considerable share of this work to temporary migrants. Travel restrictions and lockdown measures disrupted transnational care arrangements and threatened the continuous provision of care. This article uses the example of transnationally organised live-in care in Switzerland to explore measures implemented to maintain care provision during the pandemic. Particularly, it investigates the impacts of these measures on the working conditions and lives of live-in care workers. We build on Emma Dowling’s conceptualisation of ‘care fixes’ and Brigitte Aulenbacher’s notions of ‘abstraction’ and ‘appropriation’ to identify three short-term solutions and argue that they did not solve, but rather only displaced the underlying care crisis. Our insights are based on the analysis of policy documents, 32 in-depth interviews and informal conversations with workers, clients, care agencies and other experts carried out in Switzerland between April 2020 and April 2021. We emphasise the inequalities implicated in transnational care arrangements and their inherent fragility, both of which were exacerbated by the pandemic. We tentatively point to avenues for contestation and for a revaluation of care, which opened up as result of the pandemic-induced disruption of care.
新冠肺炎下的护理危机和护理修复:跨国现场护理工作的例子
2019冠状病毒病大流行使护理工作成为人们关注的焦点。在全球北方的许多国家,人们痛苦地意识到,他们把相当大一部分工作“外包”给了临时移民。旅行限制和封锁措施扰乱了跨国护理安排,并威胁到持续提供护理。本文以瑞士跨国组织的住家护理为例,探讨在大流行期间为维持护理提供所采取的措施。特别地,它调查了这些措施对居住护理工作者的工作条件和生活的影响。我们以艾玛·道林(Emma Dowling)的“护理修复”概念和布丽吉特·奥伦巴赫(Brigitte Aulenbacher)的“抽象”和“挪用”概念为基础,确定了三种短期解决方案,并认为它们没有解决,而只是取代了潜在的护理危机。我们的见解基于对政策文件的分析、32次深度访谈以及与瑞士工人、客户、护理机构和其他专家在2020年4月至2021年4月期间进行的非正式对话。我们强调跨国护理安排所涉及的不平等及其固有的脆弱性,这两者都因大流行病而加剧。我们暂时指出辩论和重新评估保健的途径,这是由于大流行病导致保健中断而开辟的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
99
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信