Older (65+) patients’ use of e-mail consultations: A Danish qualitative study using a Foucauldian framework

IF 0.8 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Martin Bavngaard, Anette Grønning
{"title":"Older (65+) patients’ use of e-mail consultations: A Danish qualitative study using a Foucauldian framework","authors":"Martin Bavngaard, Anette Grønning","doi":"10.1386/cjcs_00048_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Denmark, e-mail consultations (e-cons) are now supplementing conventional consultations with doctors and raising questions related to self-governing technology from the patient perspective. Interestingly, old patients are the most frequent users of this kind of consultation. This article examines how e-cons affect old people’s relationships with and perceptions of their general practitioners (GPs) regarding trust, self-governance and indirect/direct power. This qualitative study is based on interviews with twenty patients between 66 and 83 years old. Applying a thematic analysis in which four salient themes were identified, the study demonstrates that the patients perceive the GP as powerful, knowledgeable and busy; this corresponds with the power relationship between disciplinary institutions and individuals. At the same time, many patients use e-cons as a technology of self-governance, thereby taking responsibility for their own health while still being able to contact the clinic. In this way, patients achieve the potential for self-management, while clinics maintain their institutional power.","PeriodicalId":53977,"journal":{"name":"Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00048_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Denmark, e-mail consultations (e-cons) are now supplementing conventional consultations with doctors and raising questions related to self-governing technology from the patient perspective. Interestingly, old patients are the most frequent users of this kind of consultation. This article examines how e-cons affect old people’s relationships with and perceptions of their general practitioners (GPs) regarding trust, self-governance and indirect/direct power. This qualitative study is based on interviews with twenty patients between 66 and 83 years old. Applying a thematic analysis in which four salient themes were identified, the study demonstrates that the patients perceive the GP as powerful, knowledgeable and busy; this corresponds with the power relationship between disciplinary institutions and individuals. At the same time, many patients use e-cons as a technology of self-governance, thereby taking responsibility for their own health while still being able to contact the clinic. In this way, patients achieve the potential for self-management, while clinics maintain their institutional power.
老年(65岁以上)患者使用电子邮件咨询的情况:丹麦一项使用福卡尔框架的定性研究
在丹麦,电子邮件咨询(e-cons)现在是对医生常规咨询的补充,并从患者的角度提出了与自治技术有关的问题。有趣的是,老年患者是这类咨询的最常见用户。本文研究了电子康如何影响老年人与全科医生的关系以及他们对信任、自我治理和间接/直接权力的看法。这项定性研究基于对20名年龄在66岁至83岁之间的患者的访谈。应用主题分析,其中确定了四个突出的主题,研究表明,患者认为全科医生强大、知识渊博、忙碌;这与学科机构与个人之间的权力关系是一致的。与此同时,许多患者将电子康作为一种自我管理技术,从而在能够联系诊所的同时对自己的健康负责。通过这种方式,患者实现了自我管理的潜力,而诊所保持了他们的制度权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信