Study of the Effect of Potato Lifter Line on Some Properties at Different Depths and Varieties of Potato Crop

IF 1.3 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Acta Technologica Agriculturae Pub Date : 2023-05-23 DOI:10.2478/ata-2023-0015

O. M. Tofeq

{"title":"Study of the Effect of Potato Lifter Line on Some Properties at Different Depths and Varieties of Potato Crop","authors":"O. M. Tofeq","doi":"10.2478/ata-2023-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research aims to study the effect of the number of harvest rows under two digging depths and cultivars on the quality of harvesting potatoes (damage and losses). The experiment was factorial, using a randomised complete block design with split-split plot design and three replications for each treatment. The two types of potatoes were placed in the main plot, the type of digger in the secondary split plot, and the depth of digging in the split-split plot. The results showed no significant differences between the potato diggers in most of the studied traits. However, the two-row potato digger recorded better results than the one-row potato digger, with 83.60% undamaged tubers (UD) for the two-row digger compared to 81.07% for the one-row digger. The potato cultivar Actras achieved the highest percentage of UD and total harvesting tubers with 85.18% and 98.22%, respectively, compared to the potato cultivar Arizona with 79.49% and 95.00%. The interaction of the Actras cultivar with the two-row potato digger and a depth of 25 cm was superior and recorded the lowest percentage of bruised tubers (3.99%) and total crop losses (7.88%).","PeriodicalId":43089,"journal":{"name":"Acta Technologica Agriculturae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Technologica Agriculturae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2023-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This research aims to study the effect of the number of harvest rows under two digging depths and cultivars on the quality of harvesting potatoes (damage and losses). The experiment was factorial, using a randomised complete block design with split-split plot design and three replications for each treatment. The two types of potatoes were placed in the main plot, the type of digger in the secondary split plot, and the depth of digging in the split-split plot. The results showed no significant differences between the potato diggers in most of the studied traits. However, the two-row potato digger recorded better results than the one-row potato digger, with 83.60% undamaged tubers (UD) for the two-row digger compared to 81.07% for the one-row digger. The potato cultivar Actras achieved the highest percentage of UD and total harvesting tubers with 85.18% and 98.22%, respectively, compared to the potato cultivar Arizona with 79.49% and 95.00%. The interaction of the Actras cultivar with the two-row potato digger and a depth of 25 cm was superior and recorded the lowest percentage of bruised tubers (3.99%) and total crop losses (7.88%).

查看原文本刊更多论文

马铃薯提升系对不同深度和品种马铃薯作物某些性状影响的研究

摘要本研究旨在研究两种挖掘深度下收获行数和品种对收获土豆质量（损伤和损失）的影响。该实验是析因的，使用随机完全区组设计和分裂-分裂区设计，每种治疗重复三次。两种类型的土豆被放置在主地块中，挖掘机的类型被放置在次分割地块中，挖掘深度被放置在分割地块中。结果表明，马铃薯挖掘者在大多数研究性状上没有显著差异。然而，两排马铃薯挖掘机的结果比一排马铃薯挖掘机好，两排挖掘机的块茎未受损率为83.60%，而一排挖掘机为81.07%。马铃薯品种Actras获得了最高的UD和总收获块茎百分比，分别为85.18%和98.22%，而马铃薯品种Arizona获得了79.49%和95.00%。Actras品种与两排马铃薯挖掘机和25厘米深度的相互作用更为优越，记录了最低的碰伤块茎百分比（3.99%）和总作物损失（7.88%）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Acta Technologica Agriculturae AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

28.60%

发文量

审稿时长

18 weeks

期刊介绍： Acta Technologica Agriculturae is an international scientific double-blind peer reviewed journal focused on agricultural engineering. The journal is multidisciplinary and publishes original research and review papers in engineering, agricultural and biological sciences, and materials science. Aims and Scope Areas of interest include but are not limited to: agricultural and biosystems engineering; machines and mechanization of agricultural production; information and electrical technologies; agro-product and food processing engineering; physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic, soil working machinery and terramechanics; renewable energy sources and bioenergy; rural buildings; related issues from applied physics and chemistry, ecology, economy and energy.