Note on the Negative Approach of al-Shahīd al-Thānī Towards Logic in al-Iqtiṣād wa al-Irshād

IF 0.5 3区哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

History and Philosophy of Logic Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.1080/01445340.2022.2143219

Mahmood Zeraatpisheh

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aversion towards logic is a characteristic feature of the Islamic traditionalists. There is in fact a history of opposition to logic in Islam. As any other areas of history, here also the correct picture will not be achieved unless all of the pieces are put together. In what follows, I am going to shed light on a chapter written by Zayn al-Dīn al-ʿĀmilī (d. 966/1558), the Twelver Shīʿī Scholar better known as al-Shahīd al-Thānī. The chapter not only shows al-Shahīd al-Thānī’s negative stance towards logic, but also is important because it is a part of less studied Shīʿite traditionalists’ tendencies towards logic; those who are considered as the most influential figures in Iranian seminaries from the Safavid period up until today.

查看原文本刊更多论文

关于al- shah al-Thānī在al-Iqtiṣād wa al-Irshād中对逻辑的否定态度的注解

对逻辑的厌恶是伊斯兰传统主义者的一个特征。事实上，伊斯兰教有反对逻辑的历史。与历史上的任何其他领域一样，除非把所有的部分放在一起，否则这里也不会实现正确的画面。在接下来的文章中，我将介绍Zayn al-Dīn al-ʿĀmilī（公元966/1558年）写的一章，他是二十世纪的学者，也被称为al-ShahīD al-Thānī。这一章不仅展示了al-Shahīd al-Thānī对逻辑的否定立场，而且很重要，因为它是研究较少的什叶派传统主义者对逻辑倾向的一部分；从萨非王朝时期到今天，被认为是伊朗神学院中最具影响力的人物。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

History and Philosophy of Logic 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： History and Philosophy of Logic contains articles, notes and book reviews dealing with the history and philosophy of logic. ’Logic’ is understood to be any volume of knowledge which was regarded as logic at the time in question. ’History’ refers back to ancient times and also to work in this century; however, the Editor will not accept articles, including review articles, on very recent work on a topic. ’Philosophy’ refers to broad and general questions: specialist articles which are now classed as ’philosophical logic’ will not be published. The Editor will consider articles on the relationship between logic and other branches of knowledge, but the component of logic must be substantial. Topics with no temporal specification are to be interpreted both historically and philosophically. Each topic includes its own metalogic where appropriate.