“The Right to be Remembered?”: The Contemporary Challenges of the “Streisand Effect” in the European Judicial Reality

Q2 Social Sciences
Hovsep Kocharyan, Ondrej Hamuľák, Lusine Vardanyan
{"title":"“The Right to be Remembered?”: The Contemporary Challenges of the “Streisand Effect” in the European Judicial Reality","authors":"Hovsep Kocharyan, Ondrej Hamuľák, Lusine Vardanyan","doi":"10.2478/iclr-2022-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The protection of human privacy is one of the most disputable topics of European human rights law. That is why the judicial practice of the European Supranational Courts is rich in numerous decisions in this area, since human privacy is one of the most violated human rights, especially in the context of the development of digital technologies. Trying to find protection of their rights through institutional mechanisms of human rights (in particular, through the CJEU and the ECtHR), the applicant often finds himself/herself in a more difficult position: he/she becomes even more an object of public discussion. This phenomenon is especially vividly illustrated by the judicial practice of the European Supranational Courts in the field of protection of the right to be forgotten, which will be paid attention to in this research. At the same time, some suggestions will also be put forward to strengthen the effectiveness of protecting the confidentiality of applicants in the judicial decisions of the Courts.","PeriodicalId":36722,"journal":{"name":"International and Comparative Law Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"105 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International and Comparative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2022-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Summary The protection of human privacy is one of the most disputable topics of European human rights law. That is why the judicial practice of the European Supranational Courts is rich in numerous decisions in this area, since human privacy is one of the most violated human rights, especially in the context of the development of digital technologies. Trying to find protection of their rights through institutional mechanisms of human rights (in particular, through the CJEU and the ECtHR), the applicant often finds himself/herself in a more difficult position: he/she becomes even more an object of public discussion. This phenomenon is especially vividly illustrated by the judicial practice of the European Supranational Courts in the field of protection of the right to be forgotten, which will be paid attention to in this research. At the same time, some suggestions will also be put forward to strengthen the effectiveness of protecting the confidentiality of applicants in the judicial decisions of the Courts.
“被记住的权利?”“史翠珊效应”在欧洲司法现实中的当代挑战”
个人隐私保护是欧洲人权法中最具争议的话题之一。这就是为什么欧洲超国家法院的司法实践在这一领域有许多判决,因为人类隐私是最受侵犯的人权之一,特别是在数字技术发展的背景下。申请人试图通过人权体制机制(特别是通过欧洲法院和欧洲人权法院)寻求对其权利的保护,但往往发现自己处于更加困难的境地:他/她更成为公众讨论的对象。欧洲超国家法院在被遗忘权保护领域的司法实践尤其生动地说明了这一现象,这将是本文研究的重点。同时,也将提出一些建议,以加强法院在司法判决中对申请人保密的保护有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信