Dítě, nebo tradice? Plánování vzdělávacího obsahu v předškolním vzdělávání

Q4 Social Sciences
Eva Koželuhová, Barbora Loudová Stralczynská, Zora Syslová
{"title":"Dítě, nebo tradice? Plánování vzdělávacího obsahu v předškolním vzdělávání","authors":"Eva Koželuhová, Barbora Loudová Stralczynská, Zora Syslová","doi":"10.14712/23363177.2023.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the issue of curriculum development in pre-primary education. The aim of the research was to find out what experiences and opinion student-teachers have to the development of school and class curricula. The data were obtained through a questionnaire conducted between 2020−21 among students of BA and MA part-time programmes of faculties preparing preschool teachers in the Czech Republic (N = 1001, response rate 35%). For this paper, data from respondents working as teachers in preschools (N = 224) were used. The results showed that the approaches of preschools are heavily burdened by the pedagogical tradition of the sociocentric paradigm. A chronological approach to the arrangement of educational content in school curricula prevails (63%). Almost a third of preschools create classroom curricula for the whole year ahead. Only 44% of respondents suggest educational topics during the school year. In contrast, more flexible approaches, justified by respect for the child, dominated respondents’ preferences. In spite of this, the lack of understanding of the current notion of designing educational content at school and classroom level were still very much present in the sub-statements.","PeriodicalId":38228,"journal":{"name":"Orbis Scholae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orbis Scholae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2023.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper deals with the issue of curriculum development in pre-primary education. The aim of the research was to find out what experiences and opinion student-teachers have to the development of school and class curricula. The data were obtained through a questionnaire conducted between 2020−21 among students of BA and MA part-time programmes of faculties preparing preschool teachers in the Czech Republic (N = 1001, response rate 35%). For this paper, data from respondents working as teachers in preschools (N = 224) were used. The results showed that the approaches of preschools are heavily burdened by the pedagogical tradition of the sociocentric paradigm. A chronological approach to the arrangement of educational content in school curricula prevails (63%). Almost a third of preschools create classroom curricula for the whole year ahead. Only 44% of respondents suggest educational topics during the school year. In contrast, more flexible approaches, justified by respect for the child, dominated respondents’ preferences. In spite of this, the lack of understanding of the current notion of designing educational content at school and classroom level were still very much present in the sub-statements.
孩子还是传统?学前教育中的教育内容规划
本文论述了学前教育课程开发的问题。研究的目的是了解学生教师对学校和课堂课程的发展有什么经验和意见。数据是通过在2020-2021年期间对捷克共和国学前教师预备学院的BA和MA兼职课程的学生进行的问卷调查获得的(N=1001,回答率35%)。在这篇论文中,使用了来自幼儿园教师的受访者(N=224)的数据。研究结果表明,学龄前儿童的教学方法深受社会中心范式的教学传统的影响。学校课程中的教育内容安排普遍采用按时间顺序排列的方法(63%)。近三分之一的幼儿园开设了全年的课堂课程。只有44%的受访者建议在学年内讨论教育话题。相比之下,以尊重儿童为理由的更灵活的方法主导了受访者的偏好。尽管如此,子陈述中仍然存在对目前在学校和课堂层面设计教育内容的概念缺乏理解的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orbis Scholae
Orbis Scholae Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信