Network Mapping Interface Analysis between Carbon and Trees Corresponding to Climate Change

Q3 Social Sciences
Guen-Han Kim, Jinvo Nam, Hee-sun Choi, Yong-Il Cho, Gil-Sang Lee
{"title":"Network Mapping Interface Analysis between Carbon and Trees Corresponding to Climate Change","authors":"Guen-Han Kim, Jinvo Nam, Hee-sun Choi, Yong-Il Cho, Gil-Sang Lee","doi":"10.11628/ksppe.2022.25.6.773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective: There have been increasing correlations between the keywords 'carbon' and 'tree' in response to issues related to climate change adaptation. Given this, a study that explores how these keywords relate to issues on climate change adaptation would be significant contribution to the literature. Therefore, this study aims to determine the correlation between these keywords and their network.Methods: To address the aim, the study employed a bibliometric analysis using the VOSviewer software to conduct network-mapping interface analysis using co-occurrence-based visualization and quantification. A two-step approach was applied: the first approach identifies recent driver changes of the keywords 'carbon' and 'tree' and further meaningful keywords. The second approach conducts an in-depth network mapping analysis based on the results drawn by the first approach.Results: The results suggested that, first, 'carbon' and 'tree' were shown to reflect the assessment system and contemporary issues based on the keywords 'carbon sequestration' and 'climate change.' In addition, 'biomass,' 'tree growth,' 'tree ring' and 'trade-off' were shown to be important keywords, which indicated the need for an in-depth correlation analysis. Second, 'biomass' was the key factor in the assessment system for 'carbon sequestration,' in which 'tree growth' and 'tree ring' were included. Third, the network analysis did not report varying results on 'trade-off' compared to 'carbon' and 'tree' with respect to the basic issues on climate change.Conclusion: The conventional assessment system based on the keywords 'carbon' and 'tree' should be improved by incorporating the issues drawn from the keywords 'biomass' and 'trade-off' so that it may reflect the latest contemporary needs. The network analysis on the keywords 'carbon' and 'tree' nevertheless indicated that the two keywords were at the centre of the latest contemporary issues and the assessment system.","PeriodicalId":52383,"journal":{"name":"Journal of People, Plants, and Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of People, Plants, and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2022.25.6.773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and objective: There have been increasing correlations between the keywords 'carbon' and 'tree' in response to issues related to climate change adaptation. Given this, a study that explores how these keywords relate to issues on climate change adaptation would be significant contribution to the literature. Therefore, this study aims to determine the correlation between these keywords and their network.Methods: To address the aim, the study employed a bibliometric analysis using the VOSviewer software to conduct network-mapping interface analysis using co-occurrence-based visualization and quantification. A two-step approach was applied: the first approach identifies recent driver changes of the keywords 'carbon' and 'tree' and further meaningful keywords. The second approach conducts an in-depth network mapping analysis based on the results drawn by the first approach.Results: The results suggested that, first, 'carbon' and 'tree' were shown to reflect the assessment system and contemporary issues based on the keywords 'carbon sequestration' and 'climate change.' In addition, 'biomass,' 'tree growth,' 'tree ring' and 'trade-off' were shown to be important keywords, which indicated the need for an in-depth correlation analysis. Second, 'biomass' was the key factor in the assessment system for 'carbon sequestration,' in which 'tree growth' and 'tree ring' were included. Third, the network analysis did not report varying results on 'trade-off' compared to 'carbon' and 'tree' with respect to the basic issues on climate change.Conclusion: The conventional assessment system based on the keywords 'carbon' and 'tree' should be improved by incorporating the issues drawn from the keywords 'biomass' and 'trade-off' so that it may reflect the latest contemporary needs. The network analysis on the keywords 'carbon' and 'tree' nevertheless indicated that the two keywords were at the centre of the latest contemporary issues and the assessment system.
气候变化下碳与树木的网络映射界面分析
背景和目标:在应对气候变化适应相关问题时,“碳”和“树”这两个关键词之间的相关性越来越大。有鉴于此,一项探索这些关键词与气候变化适应问题之间关系的研究将对文献做出重大贡献。因此,本研究旨在确定这些关键词与其网络之间的相关性。方法:为了实现这一目标,本研究使用VOSviewer软件进行文献计量分析,使用基于共现的可视化和量化进行网络地图界面分析。采用了两步方法:第一种方法确定了关键词“碳”和“树”以及其他有意义的关键词的最新驱动因素变化。第二种方法基于第一种方法得出的结果进行深入的网络映射分析。结果:研究结果表明,首先,“碳”和“树”反映了基于关键词“碳固存”和“气候变化”的评估系统和当代问题此外,“生物量”、“树木生长”、“年轮”和“权衡”被证明是重要的关键词,这表明需要进行深入的相关性分析。其次,“生物量”是“碳固存”评估体系中的关键因素,其中包括“树木生长”和“树木年轮”。第三,在气候变化的基本问题上,网络分析没有报告与“碳”和“树”相比的“权衡”的不同结果。结论:应改进以“碳”和“树”为关键词的传统评估系统,将“生物量”和“权衡”这两个关键词所产生的问题纳入其中,以反映当代最新的需求。然而,对关键词“碳”和“树”的网络分析表明,这两个关键词是最新当代问题和评估系统的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of People, Plants, and Environment
Journal of People, Plants, and Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信