Characterising developmental disorders: Towards better group comparisons in developmental research

Q2 Psychology
Gnanathusharan Rajendran , Peter Edward McKenna , Martin Corley
{"title":"Characterising developmental disorders: Towards better group comparisons in developmental research","authors":"Gnanathusharan Rajendran ,&nbsp;Peter Edward McKenna ,&nbsp;Martin Corley","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2022.100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Investigating a developmental disorder (DD) must consider three questions: 1) Who are you measuring? 2) How are you measuring? and 3) What are you measuring? The decisions made – from selecting an appropriate comparison group and deciding what to match on, to the very measurements and statistics we use – directly inform the characterisations of a DD. We discuss the implications of these decisions through a critique of approaches: Including coping with heterogeneity, group matching and the importance of studying processes as well as outcomes. Our aim is to help researchers navigate this field of research and make informed decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260122000121/pdfft?md5=a96bcccb64ef3b7d16875cab78dd1942&pid=1-s2.0-S2590260122000121-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260122000121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investigating a developmental disorder (DD) must consider three questions: 1) Who are you measuring? 2) How are you measuring? and 3) What are you measuring? The decisions made – from selecting an appropriate comparison group and deciding what to match on, to the very measurements and statistics we use – directly inform the characterisations of a DD. We discuss the implications of these decisions through a critique of approaches: Including coping with heterogeneity, group matching and the importance of studying processes as well as outcomes. Our aim is to help researchers navigate this field of research and make informed decisions.

描述发育障碍:在发育研究中进行更好的群体比较
调查发育障碍(DD)必须考虑三个问题:1)你在测量谁?2)你是如何衡量的?3)你衡量的是什么?所做的决定——从选择合适的比较组和决定匹配什么,到我们使用的测量和统计数据——直接通知了DD的特征。我们通过对方法的批评来讨论这些决定的含义:包括应对异质性,组匹配以及研究过程和结果的重要性。我们的目标是帮助研究人员驾驭这一研究领域并做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methods in Psychology (Online)
Methods in Psychology (Online) Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信