The osce Institutional and Operational Possibilities in the Modern Conflict Resolution

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Security and Human Rights Pub Date : 2020-05-04 DOI:10.1163/18750230-03001009

Lesia Dorosh, O. Ivasechko

引用次数: 3

Abstract

The strengths and weaknesses of the osce Special Monitoring Mission (smm) to Ukraine are analyzed including the effectiveness of the organization’s activities in resolving modern international conflicts, as well as its opportunities and challenges in this process. The osce smm activities in Ukraine are investigated, mainly its institutional and procedural dimensions. Emphasis is placed on the idea that the osce is the main and only international governmental institution that promptly responds to the emergence of conflicts, uses already developed methods for their solution, and provides all members with information on compliance with the agreement by the parties.

查看原文本刊更多论文

osce在现代冲突解决中的制度和运作可能性

欧安组织乌克兰特别监测团(smm)的优势和劣势进行了分析，包括该组织的活动在解决现代国际冲突的有效性，以及在这一过程中的机遇和挑战。对欧安组织在乌克兰的监督管理活动进行了调查，主要是其体制和程序方面。有人强调，欧安组织是主要的和唯一的国际政府机构，它迅速对冲突的出现作出反应，使用已经制定的解决冲突的方法，并向所有成员提供有关各方遵守协定情况的资料。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Security and Human Rights Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Security and Human Rights (formerly Helsinki Monitor) is a quarterly journal devoted to issues inspired by the work and principles of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). It looks at the challenge of building security through cooperation across the northern hemisphere, from Vancouver to Vladivostok, as well as how this experience can be applied to other parts of the world. It aims to stimulate thinking on the question of protecting and promoting human rights in a world faced with serious threats to security.