Corporate Characteristics and Sustainability Reporting: From the Lens of the Legitimacy Theory

IF 0.3 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Fadzlina Mohd Fahmi, Nur Fathin R Azmi, Tuan Zainun Tuan Mat
{"title":"Corporate Characteristics and Sustainability Reporting: From the Lens of the Legitimacy Theory","authors":"Fadzlina Mohd Fahmi, Nur Fathin R Azmi, Tuan Zainun Tuan Mat","doi":"10.24191/apmaj.v17i2-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study intended to achieve two main objectives, which were to determine the level of sustainability reporting disclosure and to examine the relationship between corporate characteristics and sustainability reporting disclosure. This study used the latest Sustainability Framework introduced by Bursa Malaysia in 2015 as the basis for evaluating and measuring the level of sustainability reporting disclosure. 80 of the top 100 companies by market capitalization in the Malaysian Stock Market were taken as the sample. The published sustainability reports (within the annual reports or stand-alone sustainability reports) from 2017 to 2018 were reviewed and analyzed using the content analysis approach to test the objectives of this study. Drawing on the cy theory perspectives, corporate characteristics, such as firm size, industry type, and assurance statement practices, were chosen as the independent variables. Thefindings showed that firm size, industry type, and assurance statement practices had a significant positive relationship with the level of sustainability reporting disclosure. These findings are consistent with the legitimacy theory, which suggests that large companies in high risks industries with assurance statement practices tend to disclose higher sustainability information to legitimize their business operations and activities and maintain their image and reputation. Keywords: sustainability, corporate characteristic, sustainability reporting, legitimacy theory","PeriodicalId":41923,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/apmaj.v17i2-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study intended to achieve two main objectives, which were to determine the level of sustainability reporting disclosure and to examine the relationship between corporate characteristics and sustainability reporting disclosure. This study used the latest Sustainability Framework introduced by Bursa Malaysia in 2015 as the basis for evaluating and measuring the level of sustainability reporting disclosure. 80 of the top 100 companies by market capitalization in the Malaysian Stock Market were taken as the sample. The published sustainability reports (within the annual reports or stand-alone sustainability reports) from 2017 to 2018 were reviewed and analyzed using the content analysis approach to test the objectives of this study. Drawing on the cy theory perspectives, corporate characteristics, such as firm size, industry type, and assurance statement practices, were chosen as the independent variables. Thefindings showed that firm size, industry type, and assurance statement practices had a significant positive relationship with the level of sustainability reporting disclosure. These findings are consistent with the legitimacy theory, which suggests that large companies in high risks industries with assurance statement practices tend to disclose higher sustainability information to legitimize their business operations and activities and maintain their image and reputation. Keywords: sustainability, corporate characteristic, sustainability reporting, legitimacy theory
企业特征与可持续发展报告:合法性理论视角
本研究旨在实现两个主要目标,即确定可持续发展报告披露的水平,并研究公司特征与可持续发展报告披露之间的关系。本研究采用马来西亚证券交易所于2015年推出的最新可持续发展框架作为评估和衡量可持续发展报告披露水平的基础。选取马来西亚股票市场市值前100强公司中的80家作为样本。采用内容分析法对2017年至2018年已发布的可持续发展报告(年度报告或独立可持续发展报告)进行回顾和分析,以检验本研究的目标。借鉴cy理论的观点,选择公司特征,如公司规模、行业类型和保证报表实践作为自变量。研究发现,公司规模、行业类型和鉴证声明实务与可持续发展报告披露水平有显著的正相关关系。这些发现与合法性理论一致,该理论表明,在高风险行业中,采用保证声明的大公司倾向于披露更高的可持续性信息,以使其业务运营和活动合法化,并维护其形象和声誉。关键词:可持续发展,企业特色,可持续发展报告,合法性理论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信