Impact of foot arch status on the outcome of infra-popliteal bypasses in critical limb ischemia patients with tissue loss

IF 0.2 Q4 SURGERY
M. Soliman, H. Tawfek, Mohamed Zidan
{"title":"Impact of foot arch status on the outcome of infra-popliteal bypasses in critical limb ischemia patients with tissue loss","authors":"M. Soliman, H. Tawfek, Mohamed Zidan","doi":"10.4103/ejs.ejs_235_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective This study evaluates the effect of arterial pedal arch quality on patency rates, freedom from major amputation, and wound healing in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) with tissue loss undergoing distal bypasses. Materials and methods A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all patients with CLI with tissue loss who underwent distal bypass between 2017 and 2021 at a single institution was done. Post-bypass pedal angiography was performed to classify patients according to the foot arch status into three groups: complete pedal arch (CPA), incomplete pedal arch (IPA), and no pedal arch (NPA). Patency, amputation-free survival, patient survival, and wound healing rates are assessed at 1-year follow-up and compared among the three groups. Results A total of 88 patients had infrapopliteal bypasses (62 male; mean age, 74±9; hypertension, 85%; diabetes mellitus, 76%; smoking, 78%; and dyslipidemia, 71%). Overall, 49% of the distal bypasses originated from the popliteal artery, 31% from the superficial femoral artery, and 20% from the common femoral artery. The most common outflow artery was the anterior tibial artery (39%) followed by the posterior tibial artery (36%). At 1-year follow-up, primary patency rates in the CPA, IPA, and NPA groups were 62, 53, and 45%, respectively (P=0.41). Assisted primary patency rates were 91, 76, and 83%, respectively (P=0.424). Secondary patency rates are 100, 88, and 83%, respectively (P=0.193). Overall patient survival at the end of the follow-up period was 81%. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of 12-month amputation-free survival among the three groups (CPA 100% vs. IPA 98% vs. NPA 83%, P=0.015). Moreover, a statistically significant difference existed in wound healing rates between the study groups (CPA 81% vs. IPA 90% vs. NPA 61%, P=0.039). Conclusion Pedal arch status has a positive effect on major amputation-free survival and wound healing in patients with CLI with foot wounds undergoing infrapopliteal bypass grafting.","PeriodicalId":43393,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"41 1","pages":"1472 - 1478"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_235_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective This study evaluates the effect of arterial pedal arch quality on patency rates, freedom from major amputation, and wound healing in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) with tissue loss undergoing distal bypasses. Materials and methods A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all patients with CLI with tissue loss who underwent distal bypass between 2017 and 2021 at a single institution was done. Post-bypass pedal angiography was performed to classify patients according to the foot arch status into three groups: complete pedal arch (CPA), incomplete pedal arch (IPA), and no pedal arch (NPA). Patency, amputation-free survival, patient survival, and wound healing rates are assessed at 1-year follow-up and compared among the three groups. Results A total of 88 patients had infrapopliteal bypasses (62 male; mean age, 74±9; hypertension, 85%; diabetes mellitus, 76%; smoking, 78%; and dyslipidemia, 71%). Overall, 49% of the distal bypasses originated from the popliteal artery, 31% from the superficial femoral artery, and 20% from the common femoral artery. The most common outflow artery was the anterior tibial artery (39%) followed by the posterior tibial artery (36%). At 1-year follow-up, primary patency rates in the CPA, IPA, and NPA groups were 62, 53, and 45%, respectively (P=0.41). Assisted primary patency rates were 91, 76, and 83%, respectively (P=0.424). Secondary patency rates are 100, 88, and 83%, respectively (P=0.193). Overall patient survival at the end of the follow-up period was 81%. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of 12-month amputation-free survival among the three groups (CPA 100% vs. IPA 98% vs. NPA 83%, P=0.015). Moreover, a statistically significant difference existed in wound healing rates between the study groups (CPA 81% vs. IPA 90% vs. NPA 61%, P=0.039). Conclusion Pedal arch status has a positive effect on major amputation-free survival and wound healing in patients with CLI with foot wounds undergoing infrapopliteal bypass grafting.
足弓状态对伴有组织损失的严重肢体缺血患者腘下旁路术结果的影响
目的本研究评估动脉瓣弓质量对远端搭桥术中伴有组织损失的严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者的通畅率、免于大截肢和伤口愈合的影响。材料和方法对2017年至2021年间在一家机构接受远端搭桥术的所有CLI组织损失患者的前瞻性收集数据进行回顾性分析。根据足弓状态,进行搭桥术后足弓造影,将患者分为三组:完全足弓(CPA)、不完全足弓和无足弓(NPA)。在1年随访中评估Patency、无截肢生存率、患者生存率和伤口愈合率,并在三组之间进行比较。结果共有88例患者进行了腘下搭桥术(男性62例,平均年龄74±9岁,高血压85%,糖尿病76%,吸烟78%,血脂异常71%)。总的来说,49%的远端旁路来自腘动脉,31%来自股浅动脉,20%来自股总动脉。最常见的流出动脉是胫骨前动脉(39%),其次是胫骨后动脉(36%)。在1年随访中,CPA、IPA和NPA组的主要通畅率分别为62%、53%和45%(P=0.41)。辅助主要通畅率依次为91%、76%和83%(P=0.424)。次要通畅率分别是100%、88%和83%(P=0.0193)。随访期结束时患者的总生存率为81%。三组的12个月无截肢生存率存在统计学上的显著差异(CPA 100%对IPA 98%对NPA 83%,P=0.015)。此外,研究组之间的伤口愈合率存在统计学显著差异(CPA 81%对IPA 90%对NPA)。NPA61%,P=0.039)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书