Covid-19, cultural policy and the Irish arts sector: continuum or conjuncture?

IF 0.3 2区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Barton, S. Hadley, Denis Murphy
{"title":"Covid-19, cultural policy and the Irish arts sector: continuum or conjuncture?","authors":"R. Barton, S. Hadley, Denis Murphy","doi":"10.1080/09670882.2023.2195534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT One of the sectors most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, in Ireland as elsewhere, was the subsidised arts sector. In this article we examine one key aspect of this situation: the supports for artists. Specifically, we consider whether these supports are consistent with pre-pandemic policies in Ireland. We offer an overview of both the impact and responses to COVID-19 on the sector, and the historical narratives within Irish arts policy that informed those responses. In considering the range of instrumental policy developments within the Irish state and their relationship with the status of the artist, we question whether the introduction of the Basic Income for Artists (BIA) scheme constitutes a change or a continuum in policies articulating the relationship between the state and the arts. Using Hall’s idea of conjuncture as a tool for analysis, we argue that the different social, political, economic, and ideological contradictions brought together by COVID-19 have resulted in a strategic policy focus on the ambiguous category of “the artist” and that a number of the policy contradictions that the BIA scheme attempts to resolve are of no intrinsic concern to artists.","PeriodicalId":88531,"journal":{"name":"Irish studies review","volume":"31 1","pages":"193 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish studies review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09670882.2023.2195534","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT One of the sectors most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, in Ireland as elsewhere, was the subsidised arts sector. In this article we examine one key aspect of this situation: the supports for artists. Specifically, we consider whether these supports are consistent with pre-pandemic policies in Ireland. We offer an overview of both the impact and responses to COVID-19 on the sector, and the historical narratives within Irish arts policy that informed those responses. In considering the range of instrumental policy developments within the Irish state and their relationship with the status of the artist, we question whether the introduction of the Basic Income for Artists (BIA) scheme constitutes a change or a continuum in policies articulating the relationship between the state and the arts. Using Hall’s idea of conjuncture as a tool for analysis, we argue that the different social, political, economic, and ideological contradictions brought together by COVID-19 have resulted in a strategic policy focus on the ambiguous category of “the artist” and that a number of the policy contradictions that the BIA scheme attempts to resolve are of no intrinsic concern to artists.
新冠肺炎、文化政策和爱尔兰艺术部门:连续还是结合?
在爱尔兰和其他地方,受COVID-19大流行影响最大的部门之一是受补贴的艺术部门。在本文中,我们将研究这种情况的一个关键方面:对艺术家的支持。具体而言,我们考虑这些支持是否符合爱尔兰大流行前的政策。我们概述了2019冠状病毒病对该部门的影响和应对措施,以及爱尔兰艺术政策中为这些应对措施提供信息的历史叙述。在考虑爱尔兰国家内部的工具政策发展范围及其与艺术家地位的关系时,我们质疑艺术家基本收入(BIA)计划的引入是否构成了阐明国家与艺术之间关系的政策的变化或连续体。我们利用霍尔的“危机”概念作为分析工具,认为COVID-19带来的不同的社会、政治、经济和意识形态矛盾导致了对“艺术家”这一模糊类别的战略政策关注,而BIA计划试图解决的一些政策矛盾对艺术家来说并不是本质上的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信