{"title":"South Africa and the Politics of Coevality","authors":"Khwezi Mkhize","doi":"10.1080/18125441.2019.1651386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The argument that I make in this article is that in leaving the prison house of apartheid, South Africa generated exclusive categories of belonging (framed around multiracial nationalism and citizenship) at the expense of a pan-African politics. By reading South African engagements with the African diaspora as a signifier of disavowed solidarities, this article does a number of things. It traces disassociations with being African as constitutive, rather than epiphenomenal, to South Africa's project of freedom. I suggest that, more than two decades after apartheid, grappling with xenophobia, for instance, is not about coming to terms with what's gone “wrong” with South Africa. Rather, it is about reckoning with something internal to the logic of the country's construction and the ongoing negotiation of its history and contradictions. Working across genres and with a range of theoretical and narrative interventions by diasporic African intellectuals and creatives after 1994, I argue that narratives that engage with questions of diaspora after South Africa's transitional years offer an important vista from which to read these tensions. In thinking through the diasporic African subject's location between multiple national histories, freedom and death, tentative and conditional belonging, I propose a way of reading the cultural politics of identity in South Africa from what it refuses to be rather than its expectant narratives. This emerges as an important vantage point from which to reanimate the urgencies of pan-Africanist solidarities.","PeriodicalId":41487,"journal":{"name":"Scrutiny2-Issues in English Studies in Southern Africa","volume":"24 1","pages":"73 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/18125441.2019.1651386","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scrutiny2-Issues in English Studies in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18125441.2019.1651386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
ABSTRACT The argument that I make in this article is that in leaving the prison house of apartheid, South Africa generated exclusive categories of belonging (framed around multiracial nationalism and citizenship) at the expense of a pan-African politics. By reading South African engagements with the African diaspora as a signifier of disavowed solidarities, this article does a number of things. It traces disassociations with being African as constitutive, rather than epiphenomenal, to South Africa's project of freedom. I suggest that, more than two decades after apartheid, grappling with xenophobia, for instance, is not about coming to terms with what's gone “wrong” with South Africa. Rather, it is about reckoning with something internal to the logic of the country's construction and the ongoing negotiation of its history and contradictions. Working across genres and with a range of theoretical and narrative interventions by diasporic African intellectuals and creatives after 1994, I argue that narratives that engage with questions of diaspora after South Africa's transitional years offer an important vista from which to read these tensions. In thinking through the diasporic African subject's location between multiple national histories, freedom and death, tentative and conditional belonging, I propose a way of reading the cultural politics of identity in South Africa from what it refuses to be rather than its expectant narratives. This emerges as an important vantage point from which to reanimate the urgencies of pan-Africanist solidarities.
期刊介绍:
scrutiny2 is a double blind peer-reviewed journal that publishes original manuscripts on theoretical and practical concerns in English literary studies in southern Africa, particularly tertiary education. Uniquely southern African approaches to southern African concerns are sought, although manuscripts of a more general nature will be considered. The journal is aimed at an audience of specialists in English literary studies. While the dominant form of manuscripts published will be the scholarly article, the journal will also publish poetry, as well as other forms of writing such as the essay, review essay, conference report and polemical position piece. This journal is accredited with the South African Department of Higher Education and Training.