South Africa and the Politics of Coevality

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE
Khwezi Mkhize
{"title":"South Africa and the Politics of Coevality","authors":"Khwezi Mkhize","doi":"10.1080/18125441.2019.1651386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The argument that I make in this article is that in leaving the prison house of apartheid, South Africa generated exclusive categories of belonging (framed around multiracial nationalism and citizenship) at the expense of a pan-African politics. By reading South African engagements with the African diaspora as a signifier of disavowed solidarities, this article does a number of things. It traces disassociations with being African as constitutive, rather than epiphenomenal, to South Africa's project of freedom. I suggest that, more than two decades after apartheid, grappling with xenophobia, for instance, is not about coming to terms with what's gone “wrong” with South Africa. Rather, it is about reckoning with something internal to the logic of the country's construction and the ongoing negotiation of its history and contradictions. Working across genres and with a range of theoretical and narrative interventions by diasporic African intellectuals and creatives after 1994, I argue that narratives that engage with questions of diaspora after South Africa's transitional years offer an important vista from which to read these tensions. In thinking through the diasporic African subject's location between multiple national histories, freedom and death, tentative and conditional belonging, I propose a way of reading the cultural politics of identity in South Africa from what it refuses to be rather than its expectant narratives. This emerges as an important vantage point from which to reanimate the urgencies of pan-Africanist solidarities.","PeriodicalId":41487,"journal":{"name":"Scrutiny2-Issues in English Studies in Southern Africa","volume":"24 1","pages":"73 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/18125441.2019.1651386","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scrutiny2-Issues in English Studies in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18125441.2019.1651386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The argument that I make in this article is that in leaving the prison house of apartheid, South Africa generated exclusive categories of belonging (framed around multiracial nationalism and citizenship) at the expense of a pan-African politics. By reading South African engagements with the African diaspora as a signifier of disavowed solidarities, this article does a number of things. It traces disassociations with being African as constitutive, rather than epiphenomenal, to South Africa's project of freedom. I suggest that, more than two decades after apartheid, grappling with xenophobia, for instance, is not about coming to terms with what's gone “wrong” with South Africa. Rather, it is about reckoning with something internal to the logic of the country's construction and the ongoing negotiation of its history and contradictions. Working across genres and with a range of theoretical and narrative interventions by diasporic African intellectuals and creatives after 1994, I argue that narratives that engage with questions of diaspora after South Africa's transitional years offer an important vista from which to read these tensions. In thinking through the diasporic African subject's location between multiple national histories, freedom and death, tentative and conditional belonging, I propose a way of reading the cultural politics of identity in South Africa from what it refuses to be rather than its expectant narratives. This emerges as an important vantage point from which to reanimate the urgencies of pan-Africanist solidarities.
南非与共治政治
我在本文中提出的论点是,在离开种族隔离的监狱时,南非以牺牲泛非洲政治为代价,产生了排他性的归属类别(以多种族民族主义和公民身份为框架)。通过将南非与散居海外的非洲人的交往视为否认团结的象征,这篇文章做了很多事情。它将与非洲人身份的分离追溯为南非自由事业的基本要素,而非偶然现象。我认为,在种族隔离制度结束20多年后,例如,与仇外心理作斗争,并不是要与南非的“问题”达成妥协。更确切地说,这是对国家建设逻辑以及对其历史和矛盾的持续谈判的内在反思。通过对1994年之后流散的非洲知识分子和创意人员的理论和叙事干预,我认为,在南非过渡时期之后,涉及流散问题的叙事为解读这些紧张局势提供了一个重要的视角。在思考散居的非洲主体在多重民族历史、自由与死亡、试探性与条件性归属之间的位置时,我提出了一种解读南非身份的文化政治的方法,从它拒绝成为的东西而不是期待的叙述中。这是一个重要的有利位置,从中可以重振泛非主义团结的紧迫性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: scrutiny2 is a double blind peer-reviewed journal that publishes original manuscripts on theoretical and practical concerns in English literary studies in southern Africa, particularly tertiary education. Uniquely southern African approaches to southern African concerns are sought, although manuscripts of a more general nature will be considered. The journal is aimed at an audience of specialists in English literary studies. While the dominant form of manuscripts published will be the scholarly article, the journal will also publish poetry, as well as other forms of writing such as the essay, review essay, conference report and polemical position piece. This journal is accredited with the South African Department of Higher Education and Training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信