Can Protected Area Have Positive Effects on Community Livelihood?–Evidence from Wuyi Mountain National Nature Reserve, China

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Yaxin Zhang, Bo Zhang, Yi Xie
{"title":"Can Protected Area Have Positive Effects on Community Livelihood?–Evidence from Wuyi Mountain National Nature Reserve,\nChina","authors":"Yaxin Zhang, Bo Zhang, Yi Xie","doi":"10.1561/112.00000525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite an extensive literature indicating that protected areas (PA) affect negatively local people’s livelihood and can even exacerbate local poverty, a few studies found that PA can have positive effects on the local economy by promoting eco-tourism. In this study, we conducted a three-period survey of 170 rural households in Wuyi Mountain National Nature Reserve (WNR) in northern Fujian province of China during 2010–2014. We used robust random effect models to examine the effects of PA on local livelihood. A novel finding is that households (HHs) within WNR have much higher total income and total income per capita than HHs nearby WNR. HHs within WNR have a simple livelihood strategy with an extremely high dependence on the black tea industry, and HHs nearby WNR have diversified livelihood strategy with an increasing dependence on the black tea industry. Our results show that HH income is positively related to the age and education of the HH head. Membership of a large clan and financial and technical assistance can contribute to increasing HH income. HHs that engage only in farming as well as those that are a member of farm cooperative are likely to have lower income. The results also indicate a positive spill-over effect of communities within WNR on communities nearby WNR. We argue that communities within WNR should diversify their livelihood strategy to control risk, and communities nearby WNR should explore their comparative advantages rather than following the example of communities within WNR to expand black tea production.","PeriodicalId":54831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forest Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forest Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/112.00000525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Despite an extensive literature indicating that protected areas (PA) affect negatively local people’s livelihood and can even exacerbate local poverty, a few studies found that PA can have positive effects on the local economy by promoting eco-tourism. In this study, we conducted a three-period survey of 170 rural households in Wuyi Mountain National Nature Reserve (WNR) in northern Fujian province of China during 2010–2014. We used robust random effect models to examine the effects of PA on local livelihood. A novel finding is that households (HHs) within WNR have much higher total income and total income per capita than HHs nearby WNR. HHs within WNR have a simple livelihood strategy with an extremely high dependence on the black tea industry, and HHs nearby WNR have diversified livelihood strategy with an increasing dependence on the black tea industry. Our results show that HH income is positively related to the age and education of the HH head. Membership of a large clan and financial and technical assistance can contribute to increasing HH income. HHs that engage only in farming as well as those that are a member of farm cooperative are likely to have lower income. The results also indicate a positive spill-over effect of communities within WNR on communities nearby WNR. We argue that communities within WNR should diversify their livelihood strategy to control risk, and communities nearby WNR should explore their comparative advantages rather than following the example of communities within WNR to expand black tea production.
保护区能否对社区生计产生积极影响?——来自中国武夷山国家级自然保护区的证据
尽管大量文献表明保护区对当地人民的生计产生负面影响,甚至可能加剧当地的贫困,但少数研究发现,保护区可以通过促进生态旅游对当地经济产生积极影响。本研究于2010 ~ ~ 2014年对福建省北部武夷山国家级自然保护区170户农户进行了为期3期的调查。我们使用稳健随机效应模型来检验PA对当地生计的影响。一个新的发现是,在WNR内的家庭(HHs)的总收入和人均总收入远远高于WNR附近的HHs。WNR内的HHs生计策略单一,对红茶产业的依赖程度极高,而WNR附近的HHs生计策略多样化,对红茶产业的依赖程度越来越高。我们的研究结果表明,HH收入与HH头的年龄和受教育程度呈正相关。一个大家庭的成员资格以及财政和技术援助有助于增加家庭成员的收入。仅从事农业的卫生保健工作者以及农业合作社成员的卫生保健工作者的收入可能较低。研究结果还表明,保护区内的社区对保护区附近的社区具有积极的溢出效应。我们认为,保护区内的社区应采取多样化的生计策略来控制风险,而保护区附近的社区应探索其比较优势,而不是效仿保护区内的社区扩大红茶生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Forest Economics
Journal of Forest Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal covers all aspects of forest economics, and publishes scientific papers in subject areas such as the following: forest management problems: economics of silviculture, forest regulation and operational activities, managerial economics; forest industry analysis: economics of processing, industrial organization problems, demand and supply analysis, technological change, international trade of forest products; multiple use of forests: valuation of non-market priced goods and services, cost-benefit analysis of environment and timber production, external effects of forestry and forest industry; forest policy analysis: market and intervention failures, regulation of forest management, ownership, taxation; land use and economic development: deforestation and land use problem, national resource accounting, contribution to national and regional income and employment. forestry and climate change: using forestry to mitigate climate change, economic analysis of bioenergy, adaption of forestry to climate change.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信