Adrian Piper's aesthetic agency: Photography as catalysis for resisting neo-liberal competitive paradigms

IF 0.1 0 ART
Gerlinde Van Puymbroeck
{"title":"Adrian Piper's aesthetic agency: Photography as catalysis for resisting neo-liberal competitive paradigms","authors":"Gerlinde Van Puymbroeck","doi":"10.1386/pop_00005_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Contemporary neo-liberal society is ruled by the market. Davies, Chen and Lentin and Titley show that its objectification and categorization founds a competitive notion of agency that disables subjective construction of self and intersubjective understanding of the\n world. As the market's rules and norms are set by white patriarchy, its competitive paradigm structurally disadvantages others. Art too is objectified and categorized by neo-liberal institutions, equally embedded in white patriarchal market structures and severely limiting democratic public\n access to a diverse artistic field, argue hooks, Mercer and Piper. Yet, Piper's artwork shows, art holds emancipatory potential. Defined as transforming experience, its ambiguity provides a structure for constituting agentic subjectivity and intersubjective signification processes, defying\n objective/objectifying market workings. Photography's specific qualities allow Piper to democratize access to the paradigm she proposes. Her artistic choices may thus found the potential to publicly construct a notion of aesthetic agency as resistance to the neo-liberal market.","PeriodicalId":40690,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Photography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Photography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/pop_00005_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Contemporary neo-liberal society is ruled by the market. Davies, Chen and Lentin and Titley show that its objectification and categorization founds a competitive notion of agency that disables subjective construction of self and intersubjective understanding of the world. As the market's rules and norms are set by white patriarchy, its competitive paradigm structurally disadvantages others. Art too is objectified and categorized by neo-liberal institutions, equally embedded in white patriarchal market structures and severely limiting democratic public access to a diverse artistic field, argue hooks, Mercer and Piper. Yet, Piper's artwork shows, art holds emancipatory potential. Defined as transforming experience, its ambiguity provides a structure for constituting agentic subjectivity and intersubjective signification processes, defying objective/objectifying market workings. Photography's specific qualities allow Piper to democratize access to the paradigm she proposes. Her artistic choices may thus found the potential to publicly construct a notion of aesthetic agency as resistance to the neo-liberal market.
艾德里安·派珀的审美代理:摄影作为抵制新自由主义竞争范式的催化剂
当代新自由主义社会是以市场为主导的社会。Davies, Chen, Lentin和Titley表明,它的客观化和分类建立了一种竞争性的代理概念,使自我的主观建构和对世界的主体间理解变得不可能。由于市场的规则和规范是由白人父权制制定的,因此其竞争范式在结构上对其他人不利。霍克、默瑟和派珀认为,艺术也被新自由主义制度客观化和分类,同样嵌入白人父权市场结构,严重限制了民主公众进入多元化艺术领域的机会。然而,派珀的作品表明,艺术具有解放的潜力。它被定义为转化经验,它的模糊性为构成主体主体性和主体间意义过程提供了一种结构,蔑视客观/客观化的市场运作。摄影的特殊品质使派珀能够使她提出的范式民主化。因此,她的艺术选择可能发现了公开构建审美代理概念的潜力,作为对新自由主义市场的抵制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信