Assault on the Public Good

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
E. Motala
{"title":"Assault on the Public Good","authors":"E. Motala","doi":"10.25159/1947-9417/9305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To begin with, I would characterise the perspective that opposes the ideas and practice of free higher education as a reactionary position marked by its a-historicism, pragmatism and conservatism. The opposing approach, which is supportive of free higher education, I argue is historically contextual, seeks a radical alternative to what prevails in public policy and is fundamentally transformative. These differences were already in evidence around the 2015–2016 #FMF struggles but have been accentuated by the COVID-19 pandemic and the policy responses to it. I deal with each of these approaches in turn.","PeriodicalId":44983,"journal":{"name":"Education As Change","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education As Change","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/9305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To begin with, I would characterise the perspective that opposes the ideas and practice of free higher education as a reactionary position marked by its a-historicism, pragmatism and conservatism. The opposing approach, which is supportive of free higher education, I argue is historically contextual, seeks a radical alternative to what prevails in public policy and is fundamentally transformative. These differences were already in evidence around the 2015–2016 #FMF struggles but have been accentuated by the COVID-19 pandemic and the policy responses to it. I deal with each of these approaches in turn.
对公共利益的攻击
首先,我将反对免费高等教育理念和实践的观点描述为一种以非历史主义、实用主义和保守主义为特征的反动立场。我认为,相反的方法支持免费高等教育,这是有历史背景的,它寻求一种激进的替代方案,以取代公共政策中普遍存在的做法,并从根本上具有变革性。这些差异在2015-2016年FMF的斗争中已经体现出来,但在2019冠状病毒病大流行及其政策应对措施中更加突出。我将依次讨论每一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education As Change
Education As Change EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Education as Change is an accredited, peer reviewed scholarly online journal that publishes original articles reflecting critically on issues of equality in education and on the ways in which educational practices contribute to transformation in non-formal, formal and informal contexts. Critique, mainly understood in the tradition of critical pedagogies, is a constructive process which contributes towards a better world. Contributions from and about marginalised communities and from different knowledge traditions are encouraged. The articles could draw on any rigorous research methodology, as well as transdisciplinary approaches. Research of a very specialised or technical nature should be framed within relevant discourses. While specialised kinds of research are encouraged, authors are expected to write for a broader audience of educational researchers and practitioners without losing conceptual and theoretical depth and rigour. All sectors of education are covered in the journal. These include primary, secondary and tertiary education, adult education, worker education, educational policy and teacher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信