Models and frameworks of mental health recovery: a scoping review of the available literature.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-10 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2022.2069713
Naomi Gyamfi, Navjot Bhullar, Md Shahidul Islam, Kim Usher
{"title":"Models and frameworks of mental health recovery: a scoping review of the available literature.","authors":"Naomi Gyamfi, Navjot Bhullar, Md Shahidul Islam, Kim Usher","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2022.2069713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recovery approach involves providing a holistic and integrated service that is centered on and adapts to the aspirations and needs of consumers, who are seen as the expert on their health and well-being. Evidence is needed to address the current ambiguities related to the concept of recovery and its application.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>A scoping review was conducted to identify papers describing theories, models, and frameworks of recovery to delineate the central domains of recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three literature search strategies were used: electronic database searching; hand-searching of key journals; and a reference list review of included papers. Inclusion criteria outlined theories, models and frameworks developed to support consumers' recovery and those supporting mental health professionals (MHPs) to deliver recovery-oriented services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies (eleven articles and one book) were included in the review. The dimensions of recovery were synthesized into a framework named the Consolidated Framework for Recovery-oriented Services (CFRS). There are three domains within the framework: mechanisms/strategies; recovery as an internal process; and recovery as an external process. Each of these domains, as well as their relationships, are discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CFRS can be used by practitioners, researchers, funders, and collaborative members to conceptualize, implement, and evaluate recovery-oriented services.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"153-165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2022.2069713","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The recovery approach involves providing a holistic and integrated service that is centered on and adapts to the aspirations and needs of consumers, who are seen as the expert on their health and well-being. Evidence is needed to address the current ambiguities related to the concept of recovery and its application.

Aim: A scoping review was conducted to identify papers describing theories, models, and frameworks of recovery to delineate the central domains of recovery.

Methods: Three literature search strategies were used: electronic database searching; hand-searching of key journals; and a reference list review of included papers. Inclusion criteria outlined theories, models and frameworks developed to support consumers' recovery and those supporting mental health professionals (MHPs) to deliver recovery-oriented services.

Results: Twelve studies (eleven articles and one book) were included in the review. The dimensions of recovery were synthesized into a framework named the Consolidated Framework for Recovery-oriented Services (CFRS). There are three domains within the framework: mechanisms/strategies; recovery as an internal process; and recovery as an external process. Each of these domains, as well as their relationships, are discussed.

Conclusions: The CFRS can be used by practitioners, researchers, funders, and collaborative members to conceptualize, implement, and evaluate recovery-oriented services.

心理健康恢复的模型和框架:对现有文献的范围审查。
背景恢复方法包括提供一种全面、综合的服务,以消费者的愿望和需求为中心,并适应消费者的需求,消费者被视为他们健康和福祉的专家。需要证据来解决目前与追回概念及其适用有关的歧义。AIMA范围审查旨在确定描述回收理论、模型和框架的论文,以界定回收的核心领域。方法采用三种文献检索策略:电子数据库检索;重点期刊手查;以及对所载论文的参考文献清单审查。纳入标准概述了为支持消费者康复而制定的理论、模型和框架,以及支持心理健康专业人员提供康复服务的理论、模式和框架。结果本综述共收录了五项研究(十一篇文章和一本书)。恢复的各个方面被综合成一个名为“面向恢复的服务综合框架”的框架。框架内有三个领域:机制/战略;恢复是一个内部过程;以及作为外部过程的恢复。讨论了这些领域中的每一个,以及它们之间的关系。结论CFRS可供从业者、研究人员、资助者和合作成员用于概念化、实施和评估面向恢复的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信