On Imposters and Impact: A Comment on the Triumph of Nonsense

IF 4.8 2区管理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Academy of Management Learning & Education Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.5465/amle.2020.0123

C. Cassell

引用次数: 0

Abstract

I have sympathies with many of the arguments made by Dennis Tourish in his article, and I especially welcome his desire to restore more meaning and purpose to management research and his call for our writing to have humor, curiosity, and passion. But I cannot agree with all of his characterization of our discipline, hence, this response. My main point of disagreement is that I feel his account fails to sufficiently consider the diversity around our discipline, and those who populate it.

查看原文本刊更多论文

论冒名顶替者及其影响:评“胡说八道”的胜利

我对丹尼斯·图里什在他的文章中提出的许多观点表示赞同，我特别欢迎他为管理研究恢复更多意义和目的的愿望，以及他呼吁我们的写作要有幽默感、好奇心和激情。但我不能完全同意他对我们学科的描述，因此，有了这个回应。我不同意的主要观点是，我觉得他的描述没有充分考虑到我们学科周围的多样性，以及那些充实这个学科的人。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Academy of Management Learning & Education Multiple-

CiteScore

8.20

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： AMLE’s mission is to contribute to management learning and education by publishing theory, empirical research, reviews, critiques, and resources that address the processes of management teaching and the learning that results from it. Additionally, AMLE publishes work that addresses important issues in the institutional environment and administration of business schools and their stakeholders. The journal’s emphasis is on the study of management learning and education in all types of settings—schools and universities as well as businesses and public and non-profit organizations. AMLE is quarterly in March, June, September, and December.