Factors Affecting Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients

Q3 Nursing
K. Lim, Geum Soon Kwon
{"title":"Factors Affecting Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients","authors":"K. Lim, Geum Soon Kwon","doi":"10.7739/jkafn.2023.30.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate factors affecting quality of life in hemodialysis patients.Methods: In this descriptive study, the subjects were 127 hemodialysis patients at four dialysis clinics in Pusan and Daegu metropolitan cities. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson’s correlation coefficients, and stepwise multiple regression analysis using SPSS/WIN version 26.0.Results: The average scores for social support, symptom experience, physical function, self-care compliance, and quality of life were 3.97±0.66, 38.50±27.94, 2.24±0.60, 3.43±0.49, and 3.02±0.57, respectively. Fifty-five (43.3%) subjects had a type D personality. Quality of life showed significant differences according to educational background (F=6.44, p<.001), job (t=2.52, p=.013), and type D personality (t=4.39, p<.001). Social support (r=.32, p<.001), physical function (r=.45, p<.001), self-care compliance (r=.24, p=.005), albumin (r=.09, p=.027), and phosphorous (r=.27, p=.002) were positively correlated with quality of life. Symptom experience (r=-.40, p<.001) was negatively correlated with quality of life. The factors affecting quality of life were social support (β=.31, p<.001), physical function (β=.30, p<.001), educational background (β=.20, p=.007), type D personality (β=-.19, p<.001), and symptom experience (β=-.18, p=.019), with a total explanatory power of approximately 43%.Conclusion: Quality of life in hemodialysis patients was affected by social support, physical function, educational background, type D personality, and symptom experience. These factors should be considered in nursing interventions to improve quality of life of hemodialysis patients.","PeriodicalId":53419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2023.30.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate factors affecting quality of life in hemodialysis patients.Methods: In this descriptive study, the subjects were 127 hemodialysis patients at four dialysis clinics in Pusan and Daegu metropolitan cities. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson’s correlation coefficients, and stepwise multiple regression analysis using SPSS/WIN version 26.0.Results: The average scores for social support, symptom experience, physical function, self-care compliance, and quality of life were 3.97±0.66, 38.50±27.94, 2.24±0.60, 3.43±0.49, and 3.02±0.57, respectively. Fifty-five (43.3%) subjects had a type D personality. Quality of life showed significant differences according to educational background (F=6.44, p<.001), job (t=2.52, p=.013), and type D personality (t=4.39, p<.001). Social support (r=.32, p<.001), physical function (r=.45, p<.001), self-care compliance (r=.24, p=.005), albumin (r=.09, p=.027), and phosphorous (r=.27, p=.002) were positively correlated with quality of life. Symptom experience (r=-.40, p<.001) was negatively correlated with quality of life. The factors affecting quality of life were social support (β=.31, p<.001), physical function (β=.30, p<.001), educational background (β=.20, p=.007), type D personality (β=-.19, p<.001), and symptom experience (β=-.18, p=.019), with a total explanatory power of approximately 43%.Conclusion: Quality of life in hemodialysis patients was affected by social support, physical function, educational background, type D personality, and symptom experience. These factors should be considered in nursing interventions to improve quality of life of hemodialysis patients.
影响血液透析患者生活质量的因素
目的:本研究旨在探讨影响血液透析患者生活质量的因素。方法:在这项描述性研究中,受试者是釜山和大邱大都市四家透析诊所的127名血液透析患者。数据采用描述性统计、独立t检验、单因素方差分析、Pearson相关系数和SPSS/WIN 26.0版逐步多元回归分析进行分析。结果:社会支持、症状体验、身体功能、自我护理依从性和生活质量的平均分为3.97±0.66、38.50±27.94、2.24±0.60、3.43±0.49,分别为3.02±0.57。55名(43.3%)受试者具有D型人格。生活质量在教育背景(F=6.44,p<.001)、工作(t=2.52,p=.013)和D型人格(t=4.39,p<.001)方面存在显著差异。社会支持(r=.32,p<0.001)、身体功能(r=.45,p<.0001)、自我护理依从性(r=.24,p=.005)、白蛋白(r=.09,p=.027)和磷(r=.27,p=.002)与生活质量呈正相关。症状体验(r=-0.40,p<0.01)与生活质量呈负相关。影响生活质量的因素是社会支持(β=.31,p<.001)、身体功能(β=.30,p<.001)、教育背景(β=.20,p=.007)、D型人格(β=-19,p<.001)和症状经历(β=-18,p=.019),总解释力约为43%。结论:血液透析患者的生活质量受社会支持、身体功能、,教育背景、D型人格和症状经历。在护理干预中应考虑这些因素,以提高血液透析患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信